CWVX vs. AMDG
CWVX (Tradr 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF) and AMDG (Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CWVX returned -82.51% vs 651.01% for AMDG. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CWVX charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for AMDG.
Performance
CWVX vs. AMDG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CWVX achieves a -19.20% return, which is significantly lower than AMDG's 337.26% return.
CWVX
- 1D
- -12.22%
- 1M
- -36.09%
- 6M
- -47.33%
- YTD
- -19.20%
- 1Y
- -82.51%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMDG
- 1D
- -8.30%
- 1M
- 3.11%
- 6M
- 370.68%
- YTD
- 337.26%
- 1Y
- 651.01%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CWVX vs. AMDG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CWVX Tradr 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF | -19.20% | -81.40% |
AMDG Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF | 337.26% | 77.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between CWVX and AMDG is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2025 | 0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CWVX vs. AMDG — Risk / Return Rank
CWVX
AMDG
CWVX vs. AMDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF (CWVX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CWVX | AMDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.47 | -0.47 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.93 | 11.63 | -12.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.19 | 22.44 | -23.63 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CWVX vs. AMDG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CWVX drawdown since its inception was -89.29%, which is greater than AMDG's maximum drawdown of -63.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWVX and AMDG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CWVX | AMDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.29% | -63.32% | -25.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -89.29% | -56.48% | -32.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -87.81% | -17.26% | -70.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -66.04% | -24.97% | -41.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 69.39% | 29.22% | +40.17% |
Volatility
CWVX vs. AMDG - Volatility Comparison
Tradr 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF (CWVX) has a higher volatility of 52.29% compared to Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDG) at 47.44%. This indicates that CWVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMDG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CWVX | AMDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 52.29% | 47.44% | +4.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 133.72% | 107.19% | +26.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 188.15% | 137.82% | +50.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 188.30% | 133.24% | +55.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 188.30% | 133.24% | +55.06% |
CWVX vs. AMDG - Expense Ratio Comparison
CWVX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than AMDG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
CWVX vs. AMDG - Dividend Comparison
CWVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, more than AMDG's 2.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AMDG Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF | 2.56% | 11.21% |
CWVX Tradr 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF | 2.60% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CWVX and AMDG have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CWVX has higher volatility (52.29%) compared to AMDG (47.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CWVX dropped -89.29% vs AMDG's -63.32%.
On 1-year performance, AMDG leads with 651.01% vs -82.51% for CWVX. On fees, AMDG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, AMDG has been the lower-risk option at 47.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, AMDG has performed better with a 651.01% return vs -82.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AMDG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for CWVX.
CWVX has the higher dividend yield at 2.60%, compared with 2.56% for AMDG.
They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for CWVX and 0.75% for AMDG.
AMDG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.78 vs -0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CWVX and AMDG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer