PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CWVGX vs. CAEIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CWVGX vs. CAEIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calvert International Equity Fund (CWVGX) and Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund (CAEIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CWVGX achieves a 6.61% return, which is significantly lower than CAEIX's 23.10% return. Over the past 10 years, CWVGX has underperformed CAEIX with an annualized return of 8.07%, while CAEIX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.83% annualized return.


CWVGX

1D
0.45%
1M
7.12%
YTD
6.61%
6M
8.68%
1Y
14.28%
3Y*
9.72%
5Y*
4.36%
10Y*
8.07%

CAEIX

1D
1.24%
1M
4.18%
YTD
23.10%
6M
23.57%
1Y
49.07%
3Y*
13.90%
5Y*
6.54%
10Y*
11.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CWVGX vs. CAEIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CWVGX
Calvert International Equity Fund
6.61%19.34%1.20%15.35%-19.21%12.10%17.65%30.69%-11.48%21.25%
CAEIX
Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund
23.10%32.61%-7.13%5.67%-17.43%6.73%61.52%33.48%-19.26%29.65%

Correlation

The correlation between CWVGX and CAEIX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2007

0.83

The correlation between CWVGX and CAEIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CWVGX vs. CAEIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CWVGX
CWVGX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
CWVGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CWVGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
CWVGX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
CWVGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
CWVGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

CAEIX
CAEIX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
CAEIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAEIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAEIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
CAEIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAEIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CWVGX vs. CAEIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert International Equity Fund (CWVGX) and Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund (CAEIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CWVGXCAEIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.52

-0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.96

6.03

-5.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.36

20.83

-17.46

CWVGX vs. CAEIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CWVGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is lower than the CAEIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CWVGX and CAEIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CWVGXCAEIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

3.08

-2.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

0.34

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.60

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.07

+0.16

Drawdowns

CWVGX vs. CAEIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CWVGX drawdown since its inception was -65.15%, smaller than the maximum CAEIX drawdown of -75.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWVGX and CAEIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CWVGXCAEIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.15%

-75.81%

+10.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.90%

-8.39%

-5.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.45%

-24.57%

+8.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.26%

-32.58%

-0.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.26%

-37.54%

+4.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.00%

-48.64%

+27.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.97%

2.42%

+1.55%

Volatility

CWVGX vs. CAEIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Calvert International Equity Fund (CWVGX) is 5.26%, while Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund (CAEIX) has a volatility of 5.76%. This indicates that CWVGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CAEIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CWVGXCAEIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.26%

5.76%

-0.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.82%

12.91%

-0.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.93%

16.43%

-0.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.87%

19.18%

-2.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.00%

19.69%

-2.69%

CWVGX vs. CAEIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CWVGX has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than CAEIX's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

CWVGX vs. CAEIX - Dividend Comparison

CWVGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.40%, more than CAEIX's 0.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CAEIX
Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund
0.59%0.72%1.17%1.07%0.86%0.49%0.82%1.23%2.00%1.40%1.79%0.72%
CWVGX
Calvert International Equity Fund
5.40%5.75%1.16%0.80%2.43%6.54%0.19%0.97%1.16%1.47%2.74%0.90%

Frequently Asked Questions


CWVGX and CAEIX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CAEIX has higher volatility (5.76%) compared to CWVGX (5.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CWVGX dropped -65.15% vs CAEIX's -75.81%.

CAEIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.08 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CWVGX and CAEIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer