CWST vs. SMH
CWST (Casella Waste Systems, Inc.) is a stock, while SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) is Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Over the past 10 years, CWST returned 28.20%/yr vs 37.78%/yr for SMH. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CWST vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CWST achieves a -6.84% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 71.86% return. Over the past 10 years, CWST has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of 28.20%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 37.78% annualized return.
CWST
- 1D
- 5.87%
- 1M
- 4.38%
- YTD
- -6.84%
- 6M
- -9.50%
- 1Y
- -22.51%
- 3Y*
- 2.14%
- 5Y*
- 7.41%
- 10Y*
- 28.20%
SMH
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- 7.39%
- YTD
- 71.86%
- 6M
- 69.95%
- 1Y
- 128.64%
- 3Y*
- 62.01%
- 5Y*
- 38.15%
- 10Y*
- 37.78%
CWST vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWST Casella Waste Systems, Inc. | -6.84% | -7.44% | 23.81% | 7.75% | -7.15% | 37.89% | 34.59% | 61.57% | 23.76% | 85.50% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 71.86% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 73.38% | -33.53% | 42.13% | 55.53% | 64.45% | -9.05% | 38.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between CWST and SMH is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2000 | 0.27 |
The correlation between CWST and SMH shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.27 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CWST vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank
CWST
SMH
CWST vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Casella Waste Systems, Inc. (CWST) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CWST | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.55 | -0.65 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.63 | 8.67 | -9.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.08 | 31.31 | -32.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CWST vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CWST drawdown since its inception was -98.52%, which is greater than SMH's maximum drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWST and SMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CWST | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.52% | -84.96% | -13.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.65% | -14.93% | -20.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.72% | -35.74% | -1.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.72% | -45.30% | +7.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.72% | -45.30% | +7.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.20% | -7.47% | -16.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -52.99% | -41.00% | -11.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.56% | 4.12% | +17.44% |
Volatility
CWST vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Casella Waste Systems, Inc. (CWST) is 11.26%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 19.07%. This indicates that CWST experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CWST | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.26% | 19.07% | -7.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.04% | 29.12% | -1.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.27% | 34.88% | -0.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.42% | 35.82% | -8.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.95% | 32.96% | -2.01% |
Dividends
CWST vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
CWST has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWST Casella Waste Systems, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.18% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CWST and SMH have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMH has higher volatility (19.07%) compared to CWST (11.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CWST dropped -98.52% vs SMH's -84.96%.
SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.73 vs -0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CWST and SMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer