PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CWST vs. PGR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CWST vs. PGR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Casella Waste Systems, Inc. (CWST) and The Progressive Corporation (PGR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CWST achieves a -8.75% return, which is significantly lower than PGR's -5.09% return. Over the past 10 years, CWST has outperformed PGR with an annualized return of 28.10%, while PGR has yielded a comparatively lower 23.64% annualized return.


CWST

1D
-0.43%
1M
6.00%
YTD
-8.75%
6M
-9.77%
1Y
-24.53%
3Y*
0.57%
5Y*
6.31%
10Y*
28.10%

PGR

1D
0.42%
1M
3.65%
YTD
-5.09%
6M
-7.97%
1Y
-19.42%
3Y*
19.07%
5Y*
19.40%
10Y*
23.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CWST vs. PGR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CWST
Casella Waste Systems, Inc.
-8.75%-7.44%23.81%7.75%-7.15%37.89%34.59%61.57%23.76%85.50%
PGR
The Progressive Corporation
-5.09%-3.02%51.39%23.16%26.81%10.84%41.48%25.14%9.39%61.59%

Correlation

The correlation between CWST and PGR is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 1997

0.23

Fundamentals

EPS

CWST:

$0.11

PGR:

$19.23

PE Ratio

CWST:

794.75

PGR:

10.56

PS Ratio

CWST:

3.02

PGR:

1.36

Total Revenue (TTM)

CWST:

$1.88B

PGR:

$87.65B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CWST:

$248.24M

PGR:

$23.23B

EBITDA (TTM)

CWST:

$405.88M

PGR:

$14.81B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CWST vs. PGR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CWST
CWST Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
CWST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CWST Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
CWST Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
CWST Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
CWST Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

PGR
PGR Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
PGR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PGR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
PGR Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
PGR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
PGR Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CWST vs. PGR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Casella Waste Systems, Inc. (CWST) and The Progressive Corporation (PGR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CWSTPGRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.89

0.87

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.68

-0.80

+0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.16

-1.23

+0.07

CWST vs. PGR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CWST Sharpe Ratio is -0.73, which is comparable to the PGR Sharpe Ratio of -0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CWST and PGR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CWST vs. PGR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CWST drawdown since its inception was -98.52%, which is greater than PGR's maximum drawdown of -71.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWST and PGR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CWSTPGRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.52%

-71.06%

-27.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.37%

-24.30%

-12.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.72%

-30.35%

-7.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.72%

-30.35%

-7.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.72%

-30.35%

-7.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.75%

-25.70%

-0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-53.02%

-14.53%

-38.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

21.53%

15.96%

+5.57%

Volatility

CWST vs. PGR - Volatility Comparison

Casella Waste Systems, Inc. (CWST) has a higher volatility of 9.81% compared to The Progressive Corporation (PGR) at 7.54%. This indicates that CWST's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PGR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CWSTPGRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.81%

7.54%

+2.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.30%

16.87%

+10.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.64%

22.55%

+11.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.27%

24.55%

+2.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.91%

24.48%

+6.43%

Dividends

CWST vs. PGR - Dividend Comparison

CWST has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.84%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CWST
Casella Waste Systems, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PGR
The Progressive Corporation
6.84%2.15%0.48%0.25%0.31%6.23%2.68%3.89%1.86%1.21%2.50%2.16%

Financials

CWST vs. PGR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Casella Waste Systems, Inc. and The Progressive Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B20222023202420252026
457.33M
22.74B
(CWST) Total Revenue
(PGR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CWST vs. PGR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Casella Waste Systems, Inc. and The Progressive Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%5.0%10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%202220232024202520260
29.3%
Portfolio components
CWST - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Casella Waste Systems, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 457.33M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

PGR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Progressive Corporation reported a gross profit of 6.66B and revenue of 22.74B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 29.3%.

CWST - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Casella Waste Systems, Inc. reported an operating income of 4.86M and revenue of 457.33M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.1%.

PGR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Progressive Corporation reported an operating income of 3.68B and revenue of 22.74B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.2%.

CWST - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Casella Waste Systems, Inc. reported a net income of -5.54M and revenue of 457.33M, resulting in a net margin of -1.2%.

PGR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Progressive Corporation reported a net income of 2.95B and revenue of 22.74B, resulting in a net margin of 13.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CWST and PGR have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CWST has higher volatility (9.81%) compared to PGR (7.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CWST dropped -98.52% vs PGR's -71.06%.

CWST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.73 vs -0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CWST and PGR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer