PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CWSIX vs. SCCIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CWSIX vs. SCCIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Chartwell Small Cap Value Fund (CWSIX) and Carillon Reams Core Bond Fund (SCCIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CWSIX achieves a 18.18% return, which is significantly higher than SCCIX's 0.50% return. Over the past 10 years, CWSIX has outperformed SCCIX with an annualized return of 8.29%, while SCCIX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.37% annualized return.


CWSIX

1D
1.18%
1M
4.30%
YTD
18.18%
6M
18.13%
1Y
31.23%
3Y*
13.56%
5Y*
6.00%
10Y*
8.29%

SCCIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.53%
YTD
0.50%
6M
0.21%
1Y
5.92%
3Y*
4.06%
5Y*
0.20%
10Y*
2.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CWSIX vs. SCCIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CWSIX
Chartwell Small Cap Value Fund
18.18%-0.50%11.09%12.36%-9.72%24.32%-5.58%24.58%-12.73%8.68%
SCCIX
Carillon Reams Core Bond Fund
0.50%7.63%1.45%5.41%-13.22%-1.96%15.39%7.96%1.24%3.40%

Correlation

The correlation between CWSIX and SCCIX is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2012

-0.08

The correlation between CWSIX and SCCIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (all time) to 0.29 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CWSIX vs. SCCIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CWSIX
CWSIX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
CWSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CWSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
CWSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
CWSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
CWSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

SCCIX
SCCIX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
SCCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
SCCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CWSIX vs. SCCIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chartwell Small Cap Value Fund (CWSIX) and Carillon Reams Core Bond Fund (SCCIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CWSIXSCCIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.25

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.72

1.95

+0.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.58

6.09

+2.48

CWSIX vs. SCCIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CWSIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is comparable to the SCCIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CWSIX and SCCIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CWSIXSCCIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.73

1.44

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

0.03

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

0.46

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.45

-0.03

Drawdowns

CWSIX vs. SCCIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CWSIX drawdown since its inception was -44.08%, which is greater than SCCIX's maximum drawdown of -22.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWSIX and SCCIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CWSIXSCCIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.08%

-22.19%

-21.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.47%

-3.04%

-9.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.09%

-7.40%

-21.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.09%

-18.25%

-10.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.08%

-19.25%

-24.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.59%

+1.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.79%

-3.49%

-3.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.95%

0.97%

+2.98%

Volatility

CWSIX vs. SCCIX - Volatility Comparison

Chartwell Small Cap Value Fund (CWSIX) has a higher volatility of 5.12% compared to Carillon Reams Core Bond Fund (SCCIX) at 1.44%. This indicates that CWSIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCCIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CWSIXSCCIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.12%

1.44%

+3.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.44%

2.94%

+10.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.62%

4.16%

+15.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.53%

6.35%

+14.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.72%

5.19%

+17.53%

CWSIX vs. SCCIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CWSIX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than SCCIX's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

CWSIX vs. SCCIX - Dividend Comparison

CWSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.89%, more than SCCIX's 4.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CWSIX
Chartwell Small Cap Value Fund
18.89%22.32%41.77%3.44%1.20%10.61%0.74%4.17%8.19%4.28%0.47%0.80%
SCCIX
Carillon Reams Core Bond Fund
4.30%4.34%4.39%3.82%2.36%1.13%3.13%4.39%2.26%1.75%3.86%1.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


CWSIX and SCCIX have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CWSIX has higher volatility (5.12%) compared to SCCIX (1.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CWSIX dropped -44.08% vs SCCIX's -22.19%.

CWSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CWSIX and SCCIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer