CWSIX vs. SUBFX
Compare and contrast key facts about Chartwell Small Cap Value Fund (CWSIX) and Carillon Reams Unconstrained Bond Fund (SUBFX).
CWSIX is managed by Carillon Family of Funds. It was launched on Mar 16, 2012. SUBFX is managed by Carillon Family of Funds. It was launched on Sep 28, 2011.
Performance
CWSIX vs. SUBFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CWSIX vs. SUBFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWSIX Chartwell Small Cap Value Fund | 3.65% | -0.50% | 11.09% | 12.36% | -9.72% | 24.32% | -5.58% | 24.58% | -12.73% | 8.68% |
SUBFX Carillon Reams Unconstrained Bond Fund | 0.26% | 10.61% | 4.22% | 8.53% | -4.74% | -0.32% | 11.18% | 6.52% | 0.53% | 2.04% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CWSIX achieves a 3.65% return, which is significantly higher than SUBFX's 0.26% return. Over the past 10 years, CWSIX has outperformed SUBFX with an annualized return of 7.11%, while SUBFX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.02% annualized return.
CWSIX
- 1D
- -1.08%
- 1M
- -9.37%
- YTD
- 3.65%
- 6M
- 6.15%
- 1Y
- 14.42%
- 3Y*
- 8.56%
- 5Y*
- 4.29%
- 10Y*
- 7.11%
SUBFX
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- -1.49%
- YTD
- 0.26%
- 6M
- 1.38%
- 1Y
- 7.02%
- 3Y*
- 6.26%
- 5Y*
- 3.54%
- 10Y*
- 4.02%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CWSIX vs. SUBFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CWSIX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than SUBFX's 0.50% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CWSIX vs. SUBFX — Risk / Return Rank
CWSIX
SUBFX
CWSIX vs. SUBFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chartwell Small Cap Value Fund (CWSIX) and Carillon Reams Unconstrained Bond Fund (SUBFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CWSIX | SUBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.61 | 2.04 | -1.43 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.02 | 3.05 | -2.02 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.41 | -0.28 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.78 | 3.74 | -2.96 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.56 | 14.49 | -11.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CWSIX | SUBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 | 2.04 | -1.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 | 0.66 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 | 0.77 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.95 | -0.57 |
Correlation
The correlation between CWSIX and SUBFX is 0.22, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
CWSIX vs. SUBFX - Dividend Comparison
CWSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.54%, more than SUBFX's 6.17% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWSIX Chartwell Small Cap Value Fund | 21.54% | 22.32% | 41.77% | 3.44% | 1.20% | 10.61% | 0.74% | 4.17% | 8.19% | 4.28% | 0.47% | 0.80% |
SUBFX Carillon Reams Unconstrained Bond Fund | 6.17% | 6.44% | 4.92% | 4.52% | 2.16% | 1.96% | 3.01% | 2.83% | 2.06% | 1.17% | 1.01% | 0.52% |
Drawdowns
CWSIX vs. SUBFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CWSIX drawdown since its inception was -44.08%, which is greater than SUBFX's maximum drawdown of -11.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWSIX and SUBFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CWSIX | SUBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.08% | -11.22% | -32.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.74% | -2.11% | -13.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.09% | -11.17% | -17.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.08% | -11.22% | -32.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.57% | -1.56% | -10.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.84% | -1.47% | -5.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.76% | 0.54% | +4.22% |
Volatility
CWSIX vs. SUBFX - Volatility Comparison
Chartwell Small Cap Value Fund (CWSIX) has a higher volatility of 6.65% compared to Carillon Reams Unconstrained Bond Fund (SUBFX) at 1.54%. This indicates that CWSIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SUBFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CWSIX | SUBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.65% | 1.54% | +5.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.75% | 2.17% | +11.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.32% | 3.55% | +20.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.46% | 5.42% | +15.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.64% | 5.26% | +17.38% |