PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CWSIX vs. HWSIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CWSIX vs. HWSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Chartwell Small Cap Value Fund (CWSIX) and Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund (HWSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CWSIX having a 25.00% return and HWSIX slightly higher at 26.00%. Over the past 10 years, CWSIX has underperformed HWSIX with an annualized return of 8.49%, while HWSIX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.37% annualized return.


CWSIX

1D
0.39%
1M
0.79%
6M
14.93%
YTD
25.00%
1Y
36.68%
3Y*
12.64%
5Y*
8.26%
10Y*
8.49%
ALL TIME*
9.06%

HWSIX

1D
-0.22%
1M
6.93%
6M
18.21%
YTD
26.00%
1Y
32.64%
3Y*
12.17%
5Y*
12.32%
10Y*
11.37%
ALL TIME*
9.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

CWSIX vs. HWSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CWSIX
Chartwell Small Cap Value Fund
25.00%-0.50%11.09%12.36%-9.72%24.32%-5.58%24.58%-12.73%8.68%
HWSIX
Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund
26.00%1.60%5.00%18.85%2.97%35.54%-0.31%20.54%-15.03%7.66%

Correlation

The correlation between CWSIX and HWSIX is 0.81, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 2012

0.91

The correlation between CWSIX and HWSIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (1 year) to 0.91 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CWSIX vs. HWSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CWSIX
CWSIX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
CWSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CWSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
CWSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
CWSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
CWSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

HWSIX
HWSIX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
HWSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HWSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
HWSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
HWSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
HWSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CWSIX vs. HWSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chartwell Small Cap Value Fund (CWSIX) and Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund (HWSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CWSIXHWSIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.32

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.70

2.90

-0.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.78

9.79

-1.01

CWSIX vs. HWSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CWSIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is comparable to the HWSIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CWSIX and HWSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CWSIX vs. HWSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CWSIX drawdown since its inception was -44.08%, smaller than the maximum HWSIX drawdown of -72.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWSIX and HWSIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CWSIXHWSIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.08%

-72.00%

+27.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.47%

-10.01%

-2.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.09%

-26.92%

-2.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.09%

-26.92%

-2.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.08%

-53.67%

+9.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.35%

-0.22%

-1.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.72%

-12.03%

+5.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.83%

2.96%

+0.87%

Volatility

CWSIX vs. HWSIX - Volatility Comparison

Chartwell Small Cap Value Fund (CWSIX) has a higher volatility of 4.39% compared to Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund (HWSIX) at 2.86%. This indicates that CWSIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HWSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CWSIXHWSIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.39%

2.86%

+1.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.45%

10.45%

+3.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.31%

16.58%

+2.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.42%

21.22%

-0.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.69%

24.51%

-1.82%

CWSIX vs. HWSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CWSIX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is lower than HWSIX's 1.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

CWSIX vs. HWSIX - Dividend Comparison

CWSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.86%, more than HWSIX's 0.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CWSIX
Chartwell Small Cap Value Fund
17.86%22.32%41.77%3.44%1.20%10.61%0.74%4.17%8.19%4.28%0.47%0.80%
HWSIX
Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund
0.80%1.01%8.35%1.90%13.44%0.36%0.80%4.89%9.84%5.07%0.41%11.78%

Frequently Asked Questions


CWSIX and HWSIX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CWSIX has higher volatility (4.39%) compared to HWSIX (2.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CWSIX dropped -44.08% vs HWSIX's -72.00%.

HWSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CWSIX and HWSIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer