PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CWSIX vs. BSCMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CWSIX vs. BSCMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Chartwell Small Cap Value Fund (CWSIX) and Brandes Small Cap Value Fund (BSCMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CWSIX achieves a 21.35% return, which is significantly higher than BSCMX's 17.47% return.


CWSIX

1D
0.00%
1M
4.91%
YTD
21.35%
6M
19.63%
1Y
33.86%
3Y*
14.65%
5Y*
7.12%
10Y*
8.90%

BSCMX

1D
-0.93%
1M
3.38%
YTD
17.47%
6M
15.36%
1Y
42.48%
3Y*
26.52%
5Y*
15.98%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CWSIX vs. BSCMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
CWSIX
Chartwell Small Cap Value Fund
21.35%-0.50%11.09%12.36%-9.72%24.32%-5.58%24.58%-13.65%
BSCMX
Brandes Small Cap Value Fund
17.47%23.51%24.77%22.75%-7.89%27.61%20.38%12.82%-12.23%

Correlation

The correlation between CWSIX and BSCMX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2018

0.88

The correlation between CWSIX and BSCMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CWSIX vs. BSCMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CWSIX
CWSIX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
CWSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CWSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
CWSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
CWSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
CWSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

BSCMX
BSCMX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
BSCMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSCMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSCMX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
BSCMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSCMX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CWSIX vs. BSCMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chartwell Small Cap Value Fund (CWSIX) and Brandes Small Cap Value Fund (BSCMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CWSIXBSCMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.42

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.86

4.55

-1.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.10

15.61

-6.52

CWSIX vs. BSCMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CWSIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is comparable to the BSCMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CWSIX and BSCMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CWSIX vs. BSCMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CWSIX drawdown since its inception was -44.08%, which is greater than BSCMX's maximum drawdown of -38.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWSIX and BSCMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CWSIXBSCMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.08%

-38.12%

-5.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.47%

-9.65%

-2.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.09%

-22.34%

-6.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.09%

-22.34%

-6.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.07%

-1.79%

+1.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.77%

-6.00%

-0.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.92%

2.81%

+1.11%

Volatility

CWSIX vs. BSCMX - Volatility Comparison

Chartwell Small Cap Value Fund (CWSIX) has a higher volatility of 4.95% compared to Brandes Small Cap Value Fund (BSCMX) at 4.16%. This indicates that CWSIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSCMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CWSIXBSCMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.95%

4.16%

+0.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.69%

11.84%

+1.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.73%

17.45%

+2.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.52%

17.93%

+2.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.74%

20.58%

+2.16%

CWSIX vs. BSCMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CWSIX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than BSCMX's 0.91% expense ratio.


Dividends

CWSIX vs. BSCMX - Dividend Comparison

CWSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.40%, more than BSCMX's 3.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSCMX
Brandes Small Cap Value Fund
3.87%4.54%2.31%3.50%2.93%4.38%1.76%1.11%9.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CWSIX
Chartwell Small Cap Value Fund
18.40%22.32%41.77%3.44%1.20%10.61%0.74%4.17%8.19%4.28%0.47%0.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


CWSIX and BSCMX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CWSIX has higher volatility (4.95%) compared to BSCMX (4.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CWSIX dropped -44.08% vs BSCMX's -38.12%.

BSCMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CWSIX and BSCMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer