CWSIX vs. BRSIX
CWSIX (Chartwell Small Cap Value Fund) and BRSIX (Bridgeway Ultra Small Company Market Fund) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, CWSIX returned 8.45%/yr vs 8.26%/yr for BRSIX. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CWSIX charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for BRSIX.
Performance
CWSIX vs. BRSIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CWSIX achieves a 22.24% return, which is significantly higher than BRSIX's 19.53% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CWSIX having a 8.45% annualized return and BRSIX not far behind at 8.26%.
CWSIX
- 1D
- 1.35%
- 1M
- 0.67%
- 6M
- 14.61%
- YTD
- 22.24%
- 1Y
- 27.45%
- 3Y*
- 13.46%
- 5Y*
- 7.56%
- 10Y*
- 8.45%
BRSIX
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- 1.32%
- 6M
- 14.68%
- YTD
- 19.53%
- 1Y
- 45.46%
- 3Y*
- 20.92%
- 5Y*
- 0.28%
- 10Y*
- 8.26%
CWSIX vs. BRSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWSIX Chartwell Small Cap Value Fund | 22.24% | -0.50% | 11.09% | 12.36% | -9.72% | 24.32% | -5.58% | 24.58% | -12.73% | 8.68% |
BRSIX Bridgeway Ultra Small Company Market Fund | 19.53% | 20.09% | 14.92% | 11.46% | -23.43% | -1.93% | 25.50% | 15.34% | -17.23% | 12.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between CWSIX and BRSIX is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 2012 | 0.80 |
The correlation between CWSIX and BRSIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.80 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CWSIX vs. BRSIX — Risk / Return Rank
CWSIX
BRSIX
CWSIX vs. BRSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chartwell Small Cap Value Fund (CWSIX) and Bridgeway Ultra Small Company Market Fund (BRSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CWSIX | BRSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.29 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.22 | 3.76 | -1.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.03 | 11.21 | -4.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CWSIX vs. BRSIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CWSIX drawdown since its inception was -44.08%, smaller than the maximum BRSIX drawdown of -61.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWSIX and BRSIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CWSIX | BRSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.08% | -61.79% | +17.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.47% | -11.46% | -1.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.09% | -30.80% | +1.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.09% | -52.26% | +23.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.08% | -54.09% | +10.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.02% | -3.16% | +1.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.75% | -15.59% | +8.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.93% | 3.83% | +0.10% |
Volatility
CWSIX vs. BRSIX - Volatility Comparison
Chartwell Small Cap Value Fund (CWSIX) and Bridgeway Ultra Small Company Market Fund (BRSIX) have volatilities of 5.43% and 5.64%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CWSIX | BRSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.43% | 5.64% | -0.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.85% | 16.34% | -2.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.52% | 23.88% | -4.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.50% | 24.61% | -4.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.68% | 24.16% | -1.48% |
CWSIX vs. BRSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CWSIX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than BRSIX's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
CWSIX vs. BRSIX - Dividend Comparison
CWSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.26%, more than BRSIX's 0.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRSIX Bridgeway Ultra Small Company Market Fund | 0.86% | 1.03% | 0.62% | 0.89% | 2.12% | 1.32% | 3.46% | 1.30% | 16.12% | 13.71% | 8.25% | 12.77% |
CWSIX Chartwell Small Cap Value Fund | 18.26% | 22.32% | 41.77% | 3.44% | 1.20% | 10.61% | 0.74% | 4.17% | 8.19% | 4.28% | 0.47% | 0.80% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CWSIX and BRSIX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BRSIX has higher volatility (5.64%) compared to CWSIX (5.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CWSIX dropped -44.08% vs BRSIX's -61.79%.
BRSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CWSIX and BRSIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer