CWSGX vs. UMBHX
CWSGX (Chartwell Small Cap Growth Fund) and UMBHX (Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds from Carillon Family of Funds. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. CWSGX charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for UMBHX.
Performance
CWSGX vs. UMBHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CWSGX
- 1D
- 2.32%
- 1M
- 8.37%
- YTD
- 28.62%
- 6M
- 27.92%
- 1Y
- 56.90%
- 3Y*
- 30.49%
- 5Y*
- 12.31%
- 10Y*
- —
UMBHX
- 1D
- 2.34%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CWSGX vs. UMBHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CWSGX Chartwell Small Cap Growth Fund | 0.45% |
UMBHX Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund | 0.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between CWSGX and UMBHX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026 | 1.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CWSGX vs. UMBHX — Risk / Return Rank
CWSGX
UMBHX
CWSGX vs. UMBHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chartwell Small Cap Growth Fund (CWSGX) and Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund (UMBHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CWSGX | UMBHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.00 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.17 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CWSGX | UMBHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.60 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 1.79 | -1.14 |
Drawdowns
CWSGX vs. UMBHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CWSGX drawdown since its inception was -37.29%, which is greater than UMBHX's maximum drawdown of -1.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWSGX and UMBHX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CWSGX | UMBHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.29% | -1.86% | -35.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.97% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.80% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.29% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.21% | -0.84% | -10.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.96% | — | — |
Volatility
CWSGX vs. UMBHX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CWSGX | UMBHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.40% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.07% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.02% | 30.30% | -7.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.17% | 30.30% | -6.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.16% | 30.30% | -6.14% |
CWSGX vs. UMBHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CWSGX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than UMBHX's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
CWSGX vs. UMBHX - Dividend Comparison
CWSGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%, while UMBHX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWSGX Chartwell Small Cap Growth Fund | 0.68% | 0.87% | 6.44% | 0.00% | 4.78% | 21.74% | 6.70% | 0.03% | 0.45% | 0.02% |
UMBHX Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, CWSGX and UMBHX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
Find the right allocation for CWSGX and UMBHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer