PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CWSGX vs. UMBHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CWSGX vs. UMBHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Chartwell Small Cap Growth Fund (CWSGX) and Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund (UMBHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


CWSGX

1D
2.32%
1M
8.37%
YTD
28.62%
6M
27.92%
1Y
56.90%
3Y*
30.49%
5Y*
12.31%
10Y*

UMBHX

1D
2.34%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CWSGX vs. UMBHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CWSGX and UMBHX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026

1.00

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CWSGX vs. UMBHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CWSGX
CWSGX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
CWSGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CWSGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
CWSGX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
CWSGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
CWSGX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

UMBHX
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CWSGX vs. UMBHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chartwell Small Cap Growth Fund (CWSGX) and Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund (UMBHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CWSGXUMBHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.17

CWSGX vs. UMBHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CWSGXUMBHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

1.79

-1.14

Drawdowns

CWSGX vs. UMBHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CWSGX drawdown since its inception was -37.29%, which is greater than UMBHX's maximum drawdown of -1.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWSGX and UMBHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CWSGXUMBHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.29%

-1.86%

-35.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.21%

-0.84%

-10.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.96%

Volatility

CWSGX vs. UMBHX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CWSGXUMBHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.02%

30.30%

-7.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.17%

30.30%

-6.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.16%

30.30%

-6.14%

CWSGX vs. UMBHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CWSGX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than UMBHX's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

CWSGX vs. UMBHX - Dividend Comparison

CWSGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%, while UMBHX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CWSGX
Chartwell Small Cap Growth Fund
0.68%0.87%6.44%0.00%4.78%21.74%6.70%0.03%0.45%0.02%
UMBHX
Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, CWSGX and UMBHX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CWSGX and UMBHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer