CWSGX vs. HRCVX
CWSGX (Chartwell Small Cap Growth Fund) and HRCVX (Carillon Eagle Growth & Income Fund) are both mutual funds - CWSGX is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Carillon Family of Funds, while HRCVX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by Carillon Family of Funds. Over the past 5 years, CWSGX returned 12.66%/yr vs 9.76%/yr for HRCVX. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CWSGX charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.96%/yr for HRCVX.
Performance
CWSGX vs. HRCVX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CWSGX achieves a 35.95% return, which is significantly higher than HRCVX's 9.53% return.
CWSGX
- 1D
- 1.87%
- 1M
- 9.38%
- YTD
- 35.95%
- 6M
- 33.64%
- 1Y
- 63.38%
- 3Y*
- 32.88%
- 5Y*
- 12.66%
- 10Y*
- —
HRCVX
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- 0.67%
- YTD
- 9.53%
- 6M
- 8.63%
- 1Y
- 20.75%
- 3Y*
- 15.37%
- 5Y*
- 9.76%
- 10Y*
- 11.33%
CWSGX vs. HRCVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWSGX Chartwell Small Cap Growth Fund | 35.95% | 14.77% | 35.94% | 22.41% | -30.85% | 15.83% | 42.56% | 27.38% | -8.37% | 11.08% |
HRCVX Carillon Eagle Growth & Income Fund | 9.53% | 12.69% | 15.43% | 9.32% | -9.97% | 27.28% | 6.30% | 22.16% | -1.95% | 10.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between CWSGX and HRCVX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2017 | 0.73 |
The correlation between CWSGX and HRCVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CWSGX vs. HRCVX — Risk / Return Rank
CWSGX
HRCVX
CWSGX vs. HRCVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chartwell Small Cap Growth Fund (CWSGX) and Carillon Eagle Growth & Income Fund (HRCVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CWSGX | HRCVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.37 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.48 | 3.08 | +2.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.79 | 12.20 | +9.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CWSGX vs. HRCVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CWSGX drawdown since its inception was -37.29%, smaller than the maximum HRCVX drawdown of -52.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWSGX and HRCVX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CWSGX | HRCVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.29% | -52.16% | +14.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.97% | -7.12% | -4.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.80% | -16.04% | -11.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.29% | -20.00% | -17.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.93% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.52% | +0.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.15% | -6.59% | -4.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.01% | 1.79% | +1.22% |
Volatility
CWSGX vs. HRCVX - Volatility Comparison
Chartwell Small Cap Growth Fund (CWSGX) has a higher volatility of 8.74% compared to Carillon Eagle Growth & Income Fund (HRCVX) at 3.04%. This indicates that CWSGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HRCVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CWSGX | HRCVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.74% | 3.04% | +5.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.91% | 7.99% | +10.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.09% | 10.57% | +13.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.37% | 14.06% | +10.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.22% | 15.89% | +8.33% |
CWSGX vs. HRCVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CWSGX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than HRCVX's 0.96% expense ratio.
Dividends
CWSGX vs. HRCVX - Dividend Comparison
CWSGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%, less than HRCVX's 18.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWSGX Chartwell Small Cap Growth Fund | 0.64% | 0.87% | 6.44% | 0.00% | 4.78% | 21.74% | 6.70% | 0.03% | 0.45% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HRCVX Carillon Eagle Growth & Income Fund | 18.09% | 19.67% | 17.03% | 13.29% | 7.37% | 9.36% | 4.99% | 4.81% | 10.18% | 4.01% | 6.56% | 1.67% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CWSGX and HRCVX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CWSGX has higher volatility (8.74%) compared to HRCVX (3.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CWSGX dropped -37.29% vs HRCVX's -52.16%.
CWSGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 2.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CWSGX and HRCVX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer