CWSGX vs. PNSAX

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

CWSGX (Chartwell Small Cap Growth Fund) and PNSAX (Putnam Small Cap Growth Fund) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, CWSGX returned 10.36%/yr vs 7.68%/yr for PNSAX. Their 0.95 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. CWSGX charges 1.05%/yr vs 1.23%/yr for PNSAX.

Performance

CWSGX vs. PNSAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Chartwell Small Cap Growth Fund (CWSGX) and Putnam Small Cap Growth Fund (PNSAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CWSGX achieves a 22.74% return, which is significantly higher than PNSAX's 15.42% return.

CWSGX

• 1D: -0.59%
• 1M: -5.75%
• 6M: 15.58%
• YTD: 22.74%
• 1Y: 41.79%
• 3Y*: 26.48%
• 5Y*: 10.36%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 14.64%

PNSAX

• 1D: -0.63%
• 1M: -5.28%
• 6M: 9.33%
• YTD: 15.42%
• 1Y: 22.17%
• 3Y*: 16.85%
• 5Y*: 7.68%
• 10Y*: 15.04%
• ALL TIME*: 11.09%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CWSGX Chartwell Small Cap Growth Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
PNSAX Putnam Small Cap Growth Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

CWSGX vs. PNSAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CWSGX Chartwell Small Cap Growth Fund	22.74%	14.77%	35.94%	22.41%	-30.85%	15.83%	42.56%	27.38%	-8.37%	11.08%
PNSAX Putnam Small Cap Growth Fund	15.42%	8.91%	22.98%	22.87%	-28.10%	14.38%	47.65%	37.60%	-2.46%	11.33%

Correlation

The correlation between CWSGX and PNSAX is 0.96 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.96
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.95
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2017	0.95

The correlation between CWSGX and PNSAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CWSGX vs. PNSAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CWSGX

CWSGX Risk / Return Rank: 66
CWSGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
CWSGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
CWSGX Omega Ratio Rank: 48
CWSGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
CWSGX Martin Ratio Rank: 83

PNSAX

PNSAX Risk / Return Rank: 25
PNSAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
PNSAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
PNSAX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
PNSAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
PNSAX Martin Ratio Rank: 29

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CWSGX vs. PNSAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chartwell Small Cap Growth Fund (CWSGX) and Putnam Small Cap Growth Fund (PNSAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CWSGX	PNSAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.57	0.83	+0.74
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.17	1.31	+0.86
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.16	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.14	1.49	+1.65
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.78	4.49	+6.29

CWSGX vs. PNSAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CWSGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is higher than the PNSAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CWSGX and PNSAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CWSGX vs. PNSAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CWSGX drawdown since its inception was -37.29%, smaller than the maximum PNSAX drawdown of -69.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWSGX and PNSAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CWSGX	PNSAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.29%	-69.47%	+32.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.67%	-14.00%	+1.33%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.80%	-26.25%	-1.55%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.29%	-38.77%	+1.48%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-38.77%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.00%	-10.13%	+0.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.08%	-23.44%	+12.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.69%	4.65%	-0.96%

Volatility

CWSGX vs. PNSAX - Volatility Comparison

Chartwell Small Cap Growth Fund (CWSGX) and Putnam Small Cap Growth Fund (PNSAX) have volatilities of 7.91% and 7.81%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CWSGX	PNSAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.91%	7.81%	+0.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.55%	20.84%	-0.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.35%	25.20%	+0.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.55%	23.67%	+0.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.27%	23.74%	+0.53%

CWSGX vs. PNSAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CWSGX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is lower than PNSAX's 1.23% expense ratio.

Dividends

CWSGX vs. PNSAX - Dividend Comparison

CWSGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.71%, more than PNSAX's 0.37% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
CWSGX Chartwell Small Cap Growth Fund	0.71%	0.87%	6.44%	0.00%	4.78%	21.74%	6.70%	0.03%	0.45%	0.02%	0.00%
PNSAX Putnam Small Cap Growth Fund	0.37%	0.42%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	15.27%	4.87%	1.93%	1.88%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CWSGX and PNSAX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, CWSGX and PNSAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, CWSGX or PNSAX?

CWSGX has higher volatility (7.91%) compared to PNSAX (7.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CWSGX dropped -37.29% vs PNSAX's -69.47%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CWSGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.