PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CWSGX vs. FECGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CWSGX vs. FECGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Chartwell Small Cap Growth Fund (CWSGX) and Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund (FECGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CWSGX achieves a 35.95% return, which is significantly higher than FECGX's 22.18% return.


CWSGX

1D
1.87%
1M
9.38%
YTD
35.95%
6M
33.64%
1Y
63.38%
3Y*
32.88%
5Y*
12.66%
10Y*

FECGX

1D
1.17%
1M
5.93%
YTD
22.18%
6M
18.79%
1Y
42.27%
3Y*
19.96%
5Y*
5.98%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CWSGX vs. FECGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
CWSGX
Chartwell Small Cap Growth Fund
35.95%14.77%35.94%22.41%-30.85%15.83%42.56%3.06%
FECGX
Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund
22.18%13.04%15.26%18.90%-26.17%2.83%34.41%7.11%

Correlation

The correlation between CWSGX and FECGX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2019

0.95

The correlation between CWSGX and FECGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CWSGX vs. FECGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CWSGX
CWSGX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
CWSGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CWSGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
CWSGX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
CWSGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
CWSGX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

FECGX
FECGX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
FECGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FECGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
FECGX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
FECGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
FECGX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CWSGX vs. FECGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chartwell Small Cap Growth Fund (CWSGX) and Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund (FECGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CWSGXFECGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.32

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.48

2.95

+2.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.79

10.57

+11.22

CWSGX vs. FECGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CWSGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.73, which is higher than the FECGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CWSGX and FECGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CWSGX vs. FECGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CWSGX drawdown since its inception was -37.29%, smaller than the maximum FECGX drawdown of -41.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWSGX and FECGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CWSGXFECGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.29%

-41.85%

+4.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.97%

-14.81%

+2.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.80%

-28.45%

+0.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.29%

-40.34%

+3.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.15%

-15.65%

+4.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.01%

4.13%

-1.12%

Volatility

CWSGX vs. FECGX - Volatility Comparison

Chartwell Small Cap Growth Fund (CWSGX) has a higher volatility of 8.74% compared to Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund (FECGX) at 7.66%. This indicates that CWSGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FECGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CWSGXFECGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.74%

7.66%

+1.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.91%

16.76%

+2.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.09%

22.23%

+1.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.37%

24.70%

-0.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.22%

27.21%

-2.99%

CWSGX vs. FECGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CWSGX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than FECGX's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

CWSGX vs. FECGX - Dividend Comparison

CWSGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%, more than FECGX's 0.44% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CWSGX
Chartwell Small Cap Growth Fund
0.64%0.87%6.44%0.00%4.78%21.74%6.70%0.03%0.45%0.02%
FECGX
Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund
0.44%0.54%1.25%0.81%0.80%3.43%1.00%0.29%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, CWSGX and FECGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

CWSGX has higher volatility (8.74%) compared to FECGX (7.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CWSGX dropped -37.29% vs FECGX's -41.85%.

CWSGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CWSGX and FECGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer