CWO.NEO vs. XEM.TO
CWO.NEO (iShares Emerging Markets Fundamental Index ETF) and XEM.TO (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Index ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds from iShares - CWO.NEO tracks the FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets Index while XEM.TO tracks the Morningstar EM GR CAD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CWO.NEO returned 11.43%/yr vs 10.27%/yr for XEM.TO. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CWO.NEO charges 0.73%/yr vs 0.81%/yr for XEM.TO.
Performance
CWO.NEO vs. XEM.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CWO.NEO achieves a 13.80% return, which is significantly lower than XEM.TO's 29.23% return. Over the past 10 years, CWO.NEO has outperformed XEM.TO with an annualized return of 11.43%, while XEM.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 10.27% annualized return.
CWO.NEO
- 1D
- -1.42%
- 1M
- 4.14%
- YTD
- 13.80%
- 6M
- 13.05%
- 1Y
- 35.32%
- 3Y*
- 23.05%
- 5Y*
- 11.55%
- 10Y*
- 11.43%
XEM.TO
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- 11.30%
- YTD
- 29.23%
- 6M
- 29.57%
- 1Y
- 57.02%
- 3Y*
- 24.75%
- 5Y*
- 9.57%
- 10Y*
- 10.27%
CWO.NEO vs. XEM.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWO.NEO iShares Emerging Markets Fundamental Index ETF | 13.80% | 26.34% | 22.33% | 9.56% | -9.03% | 7.13% | -3.12% | 10.86% | -0.29% | 17.16% |
XEM.TO iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Index ETF | 29.23% | 27.25% | 14.98% | 6.49% | -15.74% | -4.09% | 14.12% | 11.48% | -8.05% | 27.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between CWO.NEO and XEM.TO is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2009 | 0.74 |
The correlation between CWO.NEO and XEM.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (5 years) to 0.83 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CWO.NEO vs. XEM.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CWO.NEO
XEM.TO
CWO.NEO vs. XEM.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Emerging Markets Fundamental Index ETF (CWO.NEO) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Index ETF (XEM.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CWO.NEO | XEM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.55 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.26 | 4.67 | -1.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.37 | 17.00 | -4.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CWO.NEO | XEM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.29 | 2.97 | -0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 | 0.58 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 | 0.57 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.43 | +0.02 |
Drawdowns
CWO.NEO vs. XEM.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CWO.NEO drawdown since its inception was -31.99%, smaller than the maximum XEM.TO drawdown of -35.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWO.NEO and XEM.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CWO.NEO | XEM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.99% | -35.29% | +3.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.90% | -12.27% | +1.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.12% | -15.30% | -1.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.80% | -31.08% | +6.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.97% | -35.29% | +3.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.42% | -0.85% | -0.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.29% | -10.45% | +0.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.86% | 3.36% | -0.50% |
Volatility
CWO.NEO vs. XEM.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Emerging Markets Fundamental Index ETF (CWO.NEO) is 5.40%, while iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Index ETF (XEM.TO) has a volatility of 8.30%. This indicates that CWO.NEO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XEM.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CWO.NEO | XEM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.40% | 8.30% | -2.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.46% | 16.79% | -4.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.50% | 19.28% | -3.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.65% | 16.84% | -0.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.52% | 18.12% | -0.60% |
CWO.NEO vs. XEM.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CWO.NEO has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is lower than XEM.TO's 0.81% expense ratio.
Dividends
CWO.NEO vs. XEM.TO - Dividend Comparison
CWO.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.45%, more than XEM.TO's 1.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWO.NEO iShares Emerging Markets Fundamental Index ETF | 2.45% | 2.79% | 3.50% | 4.14% | 5.03% | 4.61% | 2.64% | 3.01% | 3.22% | 2.60% | 2.57% | 3.23% |
XEM.TO iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Index ETF | 1.47% | 1.90% | 2.08% | 2.39% | 2.10% | 1.91% | 1.28% | 2.57% | 1.96% | 1.78% | 1.96% | 2.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CWO.NEO and XEM.TO have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CWO.NEO is cheaper at 0.73% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CWO.NEO is cheaper with a 0.73% expense ratio, compared with 0.81% for XEM.TO.
CWO.NEO tracks FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets Index, while XEM.TO tracks Morningstar EM GR CAD. Their fees differ too: 0.73% for CWO.NEO and 0.81% for XEM.TO.
Find the right allocation for CWO.NEO and XEM.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer