CWIN.TO vs. QMAX.TO
CWIN.TO (HAMILTON CHAMPIONS Enhanced Canadian Dividend ETF Class E Units) and QMAX.TO (Hamilton Technology YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CWIN.TO is a Dividend fund tracking the Solactive Canada Dividend Elite Champions Index, while QMAX.TO is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Hamilton. CWIN.TO is passively managed, while QMAX.TO is actively managed. Over the past year, CWIN.TO returned 40.70% vs 23.39% for QMAX.TO. Their 0.17 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. Both charge a 0.65% expense ratio.
Performance
CWIN.TO vs. QMAX.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CWIN.TO achieves a 21.87% return, which is significantly higher than QMAX.TO's 11.50% return.
CWIN.TO
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- 1.25%
- 6M
- 19.54%
- YTD
- 21.87%
- 1Y
- 40.70%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 31.82%
QMAX.TO
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- -8.11%
- 6M
- 19.05%
- YTD
- 11.50%
- 1Y
- 23.39%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 29.59%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA$14.83K | CA$14.75K | CA$24.96K | |
| CA$2.30M | CA$2.10M | CA$1.86M |
CWIN.TO vs. QMAX.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CWIN.TO HAMILTON CHAMPIONS Enhanced Canadian Dividend ETF Class E Units | 21.87% | 24.29% |
QMAX.TO Hamilton Technology YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF | 11.50% | 16.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between CWIN.TO and QMAX.TO is 0.09, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2025 | 0.17 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CWIN.TO vs. QMAX.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CWIN.TO
QMAX.TO
CWIN.TO vs. QMAX.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HAMILTON CHAMPIONS Enhanced Canadian Dividend ETF Class E Units (CWIN.TO) and Hamilton Technology YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (QMAX.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CWIN.TO | QMAX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.58 | 1.16 | +0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.42 | 0.90 | +4.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.02 | 2.34 | +17.68 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CWIN.TO vs. QMAX.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CWIN.TO drawdown since its inception was -10.87%, smaller than the maximum QMAX.TO drawdown of -26.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWIN.TO and QMAX.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CWIN.TO | QMAX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.87% | -26.77% | +15.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.15% | -22.86% | +15.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.14% | -11.59% | +9.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.32% | -5.26% | +3.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.93% | 8.80% | -6.87% |
Volatility
CWIN.TO vs. QMAX.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for HAMILTON CHAMPIONS Enhanced Canadian Dividend ETF Class E Units (CWIN.TO) is 2.60%, while Hamilton Technology YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (QMAX.TO) has a volatility of 10.37%. This indicates that CWIN.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QMAX.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CWIN.TO | QMAX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.60% | 10.37% | -7.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.31% | 22.35% | -13.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.53% | 25.78% | -13.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.63% | 24.98% | -11.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.63% | 24.98% | -11.35% |
CWIN.TO vs. QMAX.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both CWIN.TO and QMAX.TO have an expense ratio of 0.65%.
Dividends
CWIN.TO vs. QMAX.TO - Dividend Comparison
CWIN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.13%, less than QMAX.TO's 10.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CWIN.TO HAMILTON CHAMPIONS Enhanced Canadian Dividend ETF Class E Units | 3.13% | 3.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QMAX.TO Hamilton Technology YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF | 10.58% | 10.79% | 10.88% | 2.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CWIN.TO and QMAX.TO have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.65% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CWIN.TO and QMAX.TO have the same expense ratio: 0.65% per year.
CWIN.TO is categorized as Dividend, while QMAX.TO is Technology Equities.
Find the right allocation for CWIN.TO and QMAX.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer