PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CWI vs. FLEU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CWI vs. FLEU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF (CWI) and Franklin FTSE Eurozone ETF (FLEU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CWI achieves a 14.50% return, which is significantly higher than FLEU's 7.23% return.


CWI

1D
0.52%
1M
4.54%
YTD
14.50%
6M
16.67%
1Y
31.88%
3Y*
20.12%
5Y*
8.89%
10Y*
9.90%

FLEU

1D
0.91%
1M
1.11%
YTD
7.23%
6M
10.09%
1Y
18.88%
3Y*
17.01%
5Y*
12.01%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CWI vs. FLEU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CWI
SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF
14.50%32.75%6.27%15.74%-15.39%8.81%9.83%21.92%-13.83%1.54%
FLEU
Franklin FTSE Eurozone ETF
7.23%41.56%2.26%16.21%-9.14%23.27%0.95%26.94%-8.54%-1.24%

Correlation

The correlation between CWI and FLEU is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2017

0.76

The correlation between CWI and FLEU shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (all time) to 0.89 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CWI vs. FLEU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CWI
FLEU

Financial Services

17.4%
24.8%

Technology

14.9%
14.7%

Industrials

7.8%
21.0%

Consumer Cyclical

5.8%
8.4%

Healthcare

5.3%
5.8%

Energy

5.0%
4.0%

Basic Materials

4.4%
4.3%

Communication Services

3.2%
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

2.8%
5.2%

Utilities

1.2%
7.1%

Real Estate

0.9%
1.2%

Financial Services

CWI
17.4%
FLEU
24.8%

Technology

CWI
14.9%
FLEU
14.7%

Industrials

CWI
7.8%
FLEU
21.0%

Consumer Cyclical

CWI
5.8%
FLEU
8.4%

Healthcare

CWI
5.3%
FLEU
5.8%

Energy

CWI
5.0%
FLEU
4.0%

Basic Materials

CWI
4.4%
FLEU
4.3%

Communication Services

CWI
3.2%
FLEU
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

CWI
2.8%
FLEU
5.2%

Utilities

CWI
1.2%
FLEU
7.1%

Real Estate

CWI
0.9%
FLEU
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CWI vs. FLEU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CWI
CWI Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
CWI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CWI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
CWI Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
CWI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
CWI Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

FLEU
FLEU Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
FLEU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLEU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLEU Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
FLEU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLEU Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CWI vs. FLEU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF (CWI) and Franklin FTSE Eurozone ETF (FLEU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CWIFLEUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.21

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.79

1.41

+1.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.84

5.14

+5.70

CWI vs. FLEU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CWI Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is higher than the FLEU Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CWI and FLEU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CWIFLEUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.09

1.11

+0.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.74

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.57

-0.32

Drawdowns

CWI vs. FLEU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CWI drawdown since its inception was -60.77%, which is greater than FLEU's maximum drawdown of -33.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWI and FLEU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CWIFLEUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.77%

-33.94%

-26.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.47%

-13.41%

+1.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.85%

-15.67%

+1.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.45%

-18.67%

-10.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.71%

-0.61%

-0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.85%

-4.71%

-8.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.95%

3.68%

-0.73%

Volatility

CWI vs. FLEU - Volatility Comparison

SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF (CWI) has a higher volatility of 5.74% compared to Franklin FTSE Eurozone ETF (FLEU) at 5.07%. This indicates that CWI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLEU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CWIFLEUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.74%

5.07%

+0.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.11%

14.39%

-1.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.35%

17.03%

-1.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.24%

16.34%

-0.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.13%

18.25%

-1.12%

CWI vs. FLEU - Expense Ratio Comparison

CWI has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than FLEU's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

CWI vs. FLEU - Dividend Comparison

CWI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, more than FLEU's 2.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CWI
SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF
2.69%2.97%2.89%2.80%3.17%2.65%2.07%3.05%2.81%2.29%2.45%2.62%
FLEU
Franklin FTSE Eurozone ETF
2.07%2.22%3.18%3.25%21.45%3.03%1.94%6.06%12.17%0.07%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CWI and FLEU have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CWI has higher volatility (5.74%) compared to FLEU (5.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CWI dropped -60.77% vs FLEU's -33.94%.

On 5-year performance, FLEU leads with 12.01% vs 8.89% for CWI. On fees, FLEU is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, FLEU has been the lower-risk option at 5.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FLEU has performed better with a 12.01% return vs 8.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLEU is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for CWI.

CWI has the higher dividend yield at 2.69%, compared with 2.07% for FLEU.

CWI is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while FLEU is Europe Equities. CWI tracks MSCI All Country World ex-U.S. Index, while FLEU tracks FTSE Developed Eurozone Index - Benchmark TR Net. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for CWI and 0.09% for FLEU.

CWI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CWI and FLEU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer