CWFIX vs. CIF
Compare and contrast key facts about Chartwell Short Duration High Yield Fund (CWFIX) and MFS Intermediate High Income Fund (CIF).
CWFIX is managed by Carillon Family of Funds. It was launched on Jul 15, 2014. CIF is a passively managed fund by MFS that tracks the performance of the Barclays U.S. High-Yield Corporate 2% Issuer Capped Index. It was launched on Jul 21, 1988.
Performance
CWFIX vs. CIF - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CWFIX vs. CIF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWFIX Chartwell Short Duration High Yield Fund | -0.40% | 6.99% | 5.78% | 7.80% | -3.17% | 2.40% | 4.38% | 7.33% | 0.36% | 3.06% |
CIF MFS Intermediate High Income Fund | -2.21% | 8.97% | 11.42% | 11.85% | -32.24% | 17.80% | 0.27% | 43.26% | -19.93% | 25.66% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CWFIX achieves a -0.40% return, which is significantly higher than CIF's -2.21% return. Over the past 10 years, CWFIX has underperformed CIF with an annualized return of 4.00%, while CIF has yielded a comparatively higher 6.17% annualized return.
CWFIX
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -1.03%
- YTD
- -0.40%
- 6M
- 1.21%
- 1Y
- 5.08%
- 3Y*
- 6.16%
- 5Y*
- 3.68%
- 10Y*
- 4.00%
CIF
- 1D
- 2.85%
- 1M
- -3.86%
- YTD
- -2.21%
- 6M
- -3.39%
- 1Y
- 5.09%
- 3Y*
- 9.56%
- 5Y*
- 0.78%
- 10Y*
- 6.17%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CWFIX vs. CIF - Expense Ratio Comparison
CWFIX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than CIF's 1.50% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CWFIX vs. CIF — Risk / Return Rank
CWFIX
CIF
CWFIX vs. CIF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chartwell Short Duration High Yield Fund (CWFIX) and MFS Intermediate High Income Fund (CIF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CWFIX | CIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.99 | 0.38 | +2.60 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.25 | 0.60 | +3.65 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.80 | 1.09 | +0.71 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.72 | 0.51 | +3.21 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.45 | 1.92 | +15.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CWFIX | CIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.99 | 0.38 | +2.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.35 | 0.05 | +1.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.30 | 0.32 | +0.98 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.08 | 0.16 | +0.92 |
Correlation
The correlation between CWFIX and CIF is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
CWFIX vs. CIF - Dividend Comparison
CWFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.22%, less than CIF's 10.96% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWFIX Chartwell Short Duration High Yield Fund | 5.22% | 5.17% | 5.09% | 4.41% | 3.17% | 2.79% | 3.38% | 3.60% | 3.24% | 2.82% | 3.79% | 3.32% |
CIF MFS Intermediate High Income Fund | 10.96% | 10.46% | 10.23% | 10.02% | 11.22% | 8.40% | 9.01% | 8.63% | 11.71% | 9.16% | 9.91% | 10.05% |
Drawdowns
CWFIX vs. CIF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CWFIX drawdown since its inception was -12.41%, smaller than the maximum CIF drawdown of -69.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWFIX and CIF.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CWFIX | CIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.41% | -69.23% | +56.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.37% | -9.68% | +8.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -6.36% | -44.92% | +38.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -12.41% | -45.24% | +32.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.03% | -23.30% | +22.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.87% | -17.80% | +16.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.29% | 2.65% | -2.36% |
Volatility
CWFIX vs. CIF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Chartwell Short Duration High Yield Fund (CWFIX) is 0.70%, while MFS Intermediate High Income Fund (CIF) has a volatility of 5.35%. This indicates that CWFIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CWFIX | CIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.70% | 5.35% | -4.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.03% | 7.87% | -6.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.71% | 13.40% | -11.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.75% | 16.85% | -14.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.09% | 19.43% | -16.34% |