CWEB vs. MVLL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CWEB (Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares) and MVLL (GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds - CWEB tracks the CSI China Overseas Internet Index (200%) while MVLL tracks the Marvell Technology Inc. (MRVL). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, CWEB returned -33.98% vs 1215.17% for MVLL. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CWEB charges 1.30%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for MVLL.

Performance

CWEB vs. MVLL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares (CWEB) and GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF (MVLL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CWEB achieves a -40.28% return, which is significantly lower than MVLL's 842.68% return.

CWEB

• 1D: -7.70%
• 1M: -11.08%
• YTD: -40.28%
• 6M: -43.77%
• 1Y: -33.98%
• 3Y*: -10.47%
• 5Y*: -43.77%
• 10Y*: —

MVLL

• 1D: 7.14%
• 1M: 201.84%
• YTD: 842.68%
• 6M: 558.01%
• 1Y: 1,215.17%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CWEB vs. MVLL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CWEB Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares	-40.28%	-16.07%
MVLL GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF	842.68%	-10.19%

Correlation

The correlation between CWEB and MVLL is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.40
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2025	0.40

CWEB vs. MVLL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CWEB	MVLL
Communication Services	40.0%	-
Consumer Cyclical	38.4%	-
Healthcare	6.8%	-
Real Estate	4.8%	-
Consumer Defensive	4.4%	-
Technology	3.7%	66.6%
Financial Services	2.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Energy	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

CWEB vs. MVLL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CWEB

CWEB Risk / Return Rank: 4
CWEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
CWEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
CWEB Omega Ratio Rank: 4
CWEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
CWEB Martin Ratio Rank: 4

MVLL

MVLL Risk / Return Rank: 96
MVLL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
MVLL Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
MVLL Omega Ratio Rank: 92
MVLL Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
MVLL Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CWEB vs. MVLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares (CWEB) and GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF (MVLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CWEB	MVLL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.63	9.23	-9.86
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.70	4.79	-5.49
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.92	1.63	-0.71
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.56	25.11	-25.67
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.07	52.27	-53.34
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CWEB vs. MVLL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CWEB Sharpe Ratio is -0.63, which is lower than the MVLL Sharpe Ratio of 9.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CWEB and MVLL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CWEB	MVLL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.63	9.23	-9.86
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.46	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.25	3.33	-3.58

Drawdowns

CWEB vs. MVLL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CWEB drawdown since its inception was -98.09%, which is greater than MVLL's maximum drawdown of -59.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWEB and MVLL.

Drawdown Indicators

	CWEB	MVLL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.09%	-59.02%	-39.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-60.58%	-48.93%	-11.65%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-60.58%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-95.63%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-97.57%	0.00%	-97.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-65.42%	-22.42%	-43.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	31.81%	23.46%	+8.35%

Volatility

CWEB vs. MVLL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares (CWEB) is 22.74%, while GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF (MVLL) has a volatility of 60.78%. This indicates that CWEB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MVLL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CWEB	MVLL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	22.74%	60.78%	-38.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	40.10%	96.08%	-55.98%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	54.37%	133.11%	-78.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	94.49%	139.63%	-45.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	80.70%	139.63%	-58.93%

CWEB vs. MVLL - Expense Ratio Comparison

CWEB has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is lower than MVLL's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

CWEB vs. MVLL - Dividend Comparison

CWEB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.65%, while MVLL has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CWEB Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares	5.65%	2.77%	4.59%	2.63%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.64%	1.59%	2.98%
MVLL GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CWEB and MVLL in my portfolio?

CWEB and MVLL have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CWEB or MVLL?

MVLL has higher volatility (60.78%) compared to CWEB (22.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CWEB dropped -98.09% vs MVLL's -59.02%.

Which ETF is better, CWEB or MVLL?

On 1-year performance, MVLL leads with 1215.17% vs -33.98% for CWEB. On fees, CWEB is cheaper at 1.30% per year. On volatility, CWEB has been the lower-risk option at 22.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CWEB or MVLL?

Over the 1-year period, MVLL has performed better with a 1215.17% return vs -33.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CWEB or MVLL?

CWEB is cheaper with a 1.30% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MVLL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CWEB or MVLL?

CWEB has the higher dividend yield at 5.65%, compared with 0.00% for MVLL.

What is the main difference between CWEB and MVLL?

CWEB tracks CSI China Overseas Internet Index (200%), while MVLL tracks Marvell Technology Inc. (MRVL). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for CWEB and 1.50% for MVLL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MVLL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (9.23 vs -0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.