CWEB vs. KTEC
CWEB (Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares) and KTEC (KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CWEB is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the CSI China Overseas Internet Index (200%), while KTEC is a China Equities fund tracking the Hang Seng Tech Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CWEB returned -10.47%/yr vs 7.14%/yr for KTEC. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CWEB charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for KTEC.
Performance
CWEB vs. KTEC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CWEB achieves a -40.28% return, which is significantly lower than KTEC's -11.17% return.
CWEB
- 1D
- -7.70%
- 1M
- -11.08%
- YTD
- -40.28%
- 6M
- -43.77%
- 1Y
- -33.98%
- 3Y*
- -10.47%
- 5Y*
- -43.77%
- 10Y*
- —
KTEC
- 1D
- -3.20%
- 1M
- -0.29%
- YTD
- -11.17%
- 6M
- -12.80%
- 1Y
- -8.17%
- 3Y*
- 7.14%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CWEB vs. KTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWEB Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares | -40.28% | 29.04% | 0.12% | -32.85% | -59.43% | -72.05% |
KTEC KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF | -11.17% | 21.01% | 16.13% | -10.41% | -26.12% | -29.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between CWEB and KTEC is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2021 | 0.94 |
The correlation between CWEB and KTEC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
CWEB vs. KTEC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CWEB
KTEC
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Technology
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Energy
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Communication Services
CWEB
KTEC
Consumer Cyclical
CWEB
KTEC
Healthcare
CWEB
KTEC
Real Estate
CWEB
KTEC
-
Consumer Defensive
CWEB
KTEC
-
Technology
CWEB
KTEC
Financial Services
CWEB
KTEC
-
Basic Materials
CWEB
-
KTEC
-
Energy
CWEB
-
KTEC
-
Industrials
CWEB
-
KTEC
-
Utilities
CWEB
-
KTEC
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CWEB vs. KTEC — Risk / Return Rank
CWEB
KTEC
CWEB vs. KTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares (CWEB) and KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF (KTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CWEB | KTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 0.97 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.56 | -0.28 | -0.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.07 | -0.50 | -0.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CWEB | KTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.63 | -0.29 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.46 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.25 | -0.24 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
CWEB vs. KTEC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CWEB drawdown since its inception was -98.09%, which is greater than KTEC's maximum drawdown of -66.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWEB and KTEC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CWEB | KTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.09% | -66.90% | -31.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -60.58% | -29.36% | -31.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -60.58% | -34.71% | -25.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -95.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -97.57% | -43.95% | -53.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -65.42% | -43.97% | -21.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 31.81% | 16.26% | +15.55% |
Volatility
CWEB vs. KTEC - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares (CWEB) has a higher volatility of 22.74% compared to KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF (KTEC) at 10.62%. This indicates that CWEB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KTEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CWEB | KTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.74% | 10.62% | +12.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.10% | 20.56% | +19.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.37% | 28.01% | +26.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 94.49% | 43.22% | +51.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 80.70% | 43.22% | +37.48% |
CWEB vs. KTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison
CWEB has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than KTEC's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
CWEB vs. KTEC - Dividend Comparison
CWEB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.65%, more than KTEC's 3.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWEB Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares | 5.65% | 2.77% | 4.59% | 2.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.64% | 1.59% | 2.98% |
KTEC KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF | 3.78% | 3.36% | 0.27% | 0.81% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, CWEB and KTEC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
CWEB has higher volatility (22.74%) compared to KTEC (10.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CWEB dropped -98.09% vs KTEC's -66.90%.
On 3-year performance, KTEC leads with 7.14% vs -10.47% for CWEB. On fees, KTEC is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, KTEC has been the lower-risk option at 10.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, KTEC has performed better with a 7.14% return vs -10.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
KTEC is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for CWEB.
CWEB has the higher dividend yield at 5.65%, compared with 3.78% for KTEC.
CWEB is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while KTEC is China Equities. CWEB tracks CSI China Overseas Internet Index (200%), while KTEC tracks Hang Seng Tech Index. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and KraneShares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for CWEB and 0.69% for KTEC.
KTEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.29 vs -0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CWEB and KTEC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer