PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CW8G.L vs. LCCN.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CW8G.L vs. LCCN.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI World UCITS USD (CW8G.L) and Lyxor MSCI China UCITS ETF - Acc (LCCN.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CW8G.L is traded in GBp, while LCCN.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the LCCN.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CW8G.L achieves a 10.03% return, which is significantly higher than LCCN.L's -13.04% return.


CW8G.L

1D
-0.28%
1M
0.80%
YTD
10.03%
6M
10.16%
1Y
25.95%
3Y*
17.98%
5Y*
12.16%
10Y*
74.87%

LCCN.L

1D
-1.98%
1M
-6.57%
YTD
-13.04%
6M
-13.39%
1Y
-2.67%
3Y*
6.75%
5Y*
-5.69%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CW8G.L vs. LCCN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
CW8G.L
Amundi MSCI World UCITS USD
10.03%12.11%20.95%17.30%-8.46%23.58%11.88%23.12%7,034.89%
LCCN.L
Lyxor MSCI China UCITS ETF - Acc
-13.04%22.59%21.45%-16.01%-12.96%-21.13%25.98%17.23%-11.22%

Correlation

The correlation between CW8G.L and LCCN.L is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 5, 2018

0.45

The correlation between CW8G.L and LCCN.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (3 years) to 0.45 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CW8G.L vs. LCCN.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CW8G.L
CW8G.L Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
CW8G.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CW8G.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
CW8G.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
CW8G.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
CW8G.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

LCCN.L
LCCN.L Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
LCCN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCCN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCCN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
LCCN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCCN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CW8G.L vs. LCCN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI World UCITS USD (CW8G.L) and Lyxor MSCI China UCITS ETF - Acc (LCCN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CW8G.LLCCN.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

0.99

+0.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.87

-0.13

+4.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.11

-0.29

+15.40

CW8G.L vs. LCCN.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CW8G.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is higher than the LCCN.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CW8G.L and LCCN.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CW8G.L vs. LCCN.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CW8G.L drawdown since its inception was -25.60%, smaller than the maximum LCCN.L drawdown of -56.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CW8G.L and LCCN.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CW8G.LLCCN.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.60%

-56.30%

+30.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.67%

-20.89%

+14.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.88%

-24.77%

+5.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.88%

-49.10%

+30.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.80%

-36.37%

+35.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.64%

-26.65%

+23.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.71%

9.15%

-7.44%

Volatility

CW8G.L vs. LCCN.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi MSCI World UCITS USD (CW8G.L) is 3.35%, while Lyxor MSCI China UCITS ETF - Acc (LCCN.L) has a volatility of 6.98%. This indicates that CW8G.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LCCN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CW8G.LLCCN.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.35%

6.98%

-3.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.74%

14.56%

-6.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.47%

19.62%

-9.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.33%

28.05%

-14.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2,401.02%

26.81%

+2,374.21%

CW8G.L vs. LCCN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CW8G.L has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than LCCN.L's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

CW8G.L vs. LCCN.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither CW8G.L nor LCCN.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


CW8G.L and LCCN.L have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CW8G.L is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CW8G.L is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for LCCN.L.

CW8G.L is categorized as Global Equities, while LCCN.L is China Equities. CW8G.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while LCCN.L tracks MSCI China NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for CW8G.L and 0.29% for LCCN.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CW8G.L and LCCN.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer