CW8G.L vs. EART.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CW8G.L (Amundi MSCI World UCITS USD) and EART.L (Lyxor Euro Government Green Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - CW8G.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, while EART.L is a European Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Euro Agg Govt TR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CW8G.L returned 17.37%/yr vs 1.07%/yr for EART.L. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CW8G.L charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for EART.L.

Performance

CW8G.L vs. EART.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI World UCITS USD (CW8G.L) and Lyxor Euro Government Green Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (EART.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

CW8G.L is traded in GBp, while EART.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the EART.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CW8G.L achieves a 9.97% return, which is significantly higher than EART.L's -1.29% return.

CW8G.L

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: 5.16%
• YTD: 9.97%
• 6M: 10.16%
• 1Y: 26.81%
• 3Y*: 17.37%
• 5Y*: 12.80%
• 10Y*: 13.68%

EART.L

• 1D: -0.64%
• 1M: 0.82%
• YTD: -1.29%
• 6M: -1.46%
• 1Y: 0.87%
• 3Y*: 1.07%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CW8G.L vs. EART.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CW8G.L Amundi MSCI World UCITS USD	9.97%	12.11%	20.95%	17.29%	-8.45%	9.61%
EART.L Lyxor Euro Government Green Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc	-1.29%	2.88%	-4.87%	6.69%	-26.52%	-3.52%

Correlation

The correlation between CW8G.L and EART.L is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.27
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.14
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2021	0.06

Over the past year, CW8G.L and EART.L have become more correlated (0.27) than their long-term average of 0.06, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

CW8G.L vs. EART.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CW8G.L

CW8G.L Risk / Return Rank: 83
CW8G.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
CW8G.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
CW8G.L Omega Ratio Rank: 85
CW8G.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
CW8G.L Martin Ratio Rank: 81

EART.L

EART.L Risk / Return Rank: 10
EART.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
EART.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
EART.L Omega Ratio Rank: 10
EART.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
EART.L Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CW8G.L vs. EART.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI World UCITS USD (CW8G.L) and Lyxor Euro Government Green Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (EART.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CW8G.L	EART.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.74	0.11	+2.62
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.74	0.21	+3.53
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	1.02	+0.49
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.00	0.14	+3.87
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.91	0.30	+15.61
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CW8G.L vs. EART.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CW8G.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.74, which is higher than the EART.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CW8G.L and EART.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CW8G.L	EART.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.74	0.11	+2.62
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.97	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.95	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.99	-0.56	+1.54

Drawdowns

CW8G.L vs. EART.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CW8G.L drawdown since its inception was -25.60%, smaller than the maximum EART.L drawdown of -35.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CW8G.L and EART.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	CW8G.L	EART.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.60%	-35.57%	+9.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.67%	-5.90%	-0.77%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.88%	-9.43%	-9.45%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.88%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-25.60%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.15%	-29.22%	+29.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.10%	-25.75%	+22.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.68%	2.70%	-1.02%

Volatility

CW8G.L vs. EART.L - Volatility Comparison

Amundi MSCI World UCITS USD (CW8G.L) and Lyxor Euro Government Green Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (EART.L) have volatilities of 2.55% and 2.56%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CW8G.L	EART.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.55%	2.56%	-0.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.27%	5.57%	+1.70%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.75%	7.06%	+2.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.21%	11.21%	+2.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.45%	11.21%	+3.24%

CW8G.L vs. EART.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CW8G.L has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than EART.L's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

CW8G.L vs. EART.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither CW8G.L nor EART.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CW8G.L and EART.L in my portfolio?

CW8G.L and EART.L have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CW8G.L or EART.L?

On fees, EART.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CW8G.L or EART.L?

EART.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for CW8G.L.

What is the main difference between CW8G.L and EART.L?

CW8G.L is categorized as Global Equities, while EART.L is European Government Bonds. CW8G.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while EART.L tracks Bloomberg Euro Agg Govt TR EUR. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for CW8G.L and 0.20% for EART.L.