PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CVY vs. XMMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CVY vs. XMMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Zacks Multi-Asset Income ETF (CVY) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CVY achieves a 7.59% return, which is significantly lower than XMMO's 23.73% return. Over the past 10 years, CVY has underperformed XMMO with an annualized return of 8.41%, while XMMO has yielded a comparatively higher 19.73% annualized return.


CVY

1D
-1.25%
1M
0.78%
YTD
7.59%
6M
8.13%
1Y
17.25%
3Y*
15.33%
5Y*
7.04%
10Y*
8.41%

XMMO

1D
0.62%
1M
6.87%
YTD
23.73%
6M
25.73%
1Y
36.97%
3Y*
32.10%
5Y*
16.69%
10Y*
19.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CVY vs. XMMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CVY
Invesco Zacks Multi-Asset Income ETF
7.59%11.00%10.28%17.87%-9.27%25.31%-10.56%25.97%-10.77%15.91%
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
23.73%13.04%38.03%20.39%-16.02%16.69%29.17%36.78%6.12%37.18%

Correlation

The correlation between CVY and XMMO is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2006

0.74

Over the past year, the correlation between CVY and XMMO has dropped to 0.50 - well below their long-term average of 0.74, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

CVY vs. XMMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CVY
XMMO

Financial Services

38.3%
2.4%

Energy

20.1%
7.7%

Real Estate

11.8%
6.1%

Technology

5.7%
16.7%

Consumer Cyclical

5.4%
4.6%

Industrials

4.8%
41.1%

Healthcare

4.5%
6.3%

Basic Materials

4.3%
7.2%

Communication Services

3.1%
1.6%

Consumer Defensive

1.5%
0.5%

Utilities

0.6%
5.8%

Financial Services

CVY
38.3%
XMMO
2.4%

Energy

CVY
20.1%
XMMO
7.7%

Real Estate

CVY
11.8%
XMMO
6.1%

Technology

CVY
5.7%
XMMO
16.7%

Consumer Cyclical

CVY
5.4%
XMMO
4.6%

Industrials

CVY
4.8%
XMMO
41.1%

Healthcare

CVY
4.5%
XMMO
6.3%

Basic Materials

CVY
4.3%
XMMO
7.2%

Communication Services

CVY
3.1%
XMMO
1.6%

Consumer Defensive

CVY
1.5%
XMMO
0.5%

Utilities

CVY
0.6%
XMMO
5.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CVY vs. XMMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CVY
CVY Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
CVY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CVY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
CVY Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
CVY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
CVY Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

XMMO
XMMO Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
XMMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMMO Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
XMMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMMO Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CVY vs. XMMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Zacks Multi-Asset Income ETF (CVY) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CVYXMMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.35

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.33

4.45

-2.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.82

18.21

-10.40

CVY vs. XMMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CVY Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is comparable to the XMMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CVY and XMMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CVYXMMODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.58

1.99

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

0.78

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

0.89

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.58

-0.30

Drawdowns

CVY vs. XMMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CVY drawdown since its inception was -66.86%, which is greater than XMMO's maximum drawdown of -55.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVY and XMMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CVYXMMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.86%

-55.37%

-11.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.43%

-8.34%

+0.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.79%

-24.93%

+8.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.58%

-27.91%

+6.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.47%

-36.74%

-13.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.28%

0.00%

-1.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.41%

-9.45%

-0.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.21%

2.04%

+0.17%

Volatility

CVY vs. XMMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Zacks Multi-Asset Income ETF (CVY) is 2.87%, while Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) has a volatility of 7.82%. This indicates that CVY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CVYXMMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.87%

7.82%

-4.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.81%

15.54%

-7.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.00%

18.71%

-7.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.20%

21.45%

-5.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.56%

22.27%

-2.71%

CVY vs. XMMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CVY has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than XMMO's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

CVY vs. XMMO - Dividend Comparison

CVY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.75%, more than XMMO's 0.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CVY
Invesco Zacks Multi-Asset Income ETF
3.75%3.99%4.07%4.41%5.18%2.37%3.40%3.22%4.44%3.94%4.50%5.89%
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
0.60%0.78%0.34%0.80%1.43%0.41%0.61%0.60%0.19%0.21%0.22%0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


CVY and XMMO have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XMMO has higher volatility (7.82%) compared to CVY (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CVY dropped -66.86% vs XMMO's -55.37%.

On 10-year performance, XMMO leads with 19.73% vs 8.41% for CVY. On fees, XMMO is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, CVY has been the lower-risk option at 2.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XMMO has performed better with a 19.73% return vs 8.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XMMO is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.21% for CVY.

CVY has the higher dividend yield at 3.75%, compared with 0.60% for XMMO.

CVY is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while XMMO is Momentum. CVY tracks Zacks Multi-Asset Income Index, while XMMO tracks S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index. Their fees differ too: 1.21% for CVY and 0.35% for XMMO.

XMMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CVY and XMMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer