PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CVY vs. TLTW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CVY vs. TLTW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Zacks Multi-Asset Income ETF (CVY) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (TLTW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CVY achieves a 10.45% return, which is significantly higher than TLTW's 1.90% return.


CVY

1D
0.94%
1M
3.26%
YTD
10.45%
6M
9.84%
1Y
18.64%
3Y*
15.39%
5Y*
7.49%
10Y*
8.96%

TLTW

1D
-0.14%
1M
2.84%
YTD
1.90%
6M
2.26%
1Y
9.45%
3Y*
1.13%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CVY vs. TLTW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
CVY
Invesco Zacks Multi-Asset Income ETF
10.45%11.00%10.28%17.87%-5.51%
TLTW
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF
1.90%11.36%-2.18%0.73%-11.14%

Correlation

The correlation between CVY and TLTW is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2022

0.19

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CVY vs. TLTW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CVY
CVY Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
CVY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CVY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
CVY Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
CVY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
CVY Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

TLTW
TLTW Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
TLTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLTW Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
TLTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLTW Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CVY vs. TLTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Zacks Multi-Asset Income ETF (CVY) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (TLTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CVYTLTWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.21

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.46

1.52

+0.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.22

4.41

+3.82

CVY vs. TLTW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CVY Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is higher than the TLTW Sharpe Ratio of 1.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CVY and TLTW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CVY vs. TLTW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CVY drawdown since its inception was -66.86%, which is greater than TLTW's maximum drawdown of -18.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVY and TLTW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CVYTLTWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.86%

-18.61%

-48.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.43%

-5.97%

-1.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.79%

-17.19%

+0.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.54%

+2.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.40%

-8.20%

-2.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.21%

2.05%

+0.16%

Volatility

CVY vs. TLTW - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Zacks Multi-Asset Income ETF (CVY) has a higher volatility of 3.13% compared to iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (TLTW) at 2.31%. This indicates that CVY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TLTW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CVYTLTWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.13%

2.31%

+0.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.89%

5.85%

+2.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.04%

7.68%

+3.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.22%

11.36%

+4.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.55%

11.36%

+8.19%

CVY vs. TLTW - Expense Ratio Comparison

CVY has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than TLTW's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

CVY vs. TLTW - Dividend Comparison

CVY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.65%, less than TLTW's 11.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CVY
Invesco Zacks Multi-Asset Income ETF
3.65%3.99%4.07%4.41%5.18%2.37%3.40%3.22%4.44%3.94%4.50%5.89%
TLTW
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF
11.68%14.82%14.47%19.59%8.71%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CVY and TLTW have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CVY has higher volatility (3.13%) compared to TLTW (2.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CVY dropped -66.86% vs TLTW's -18.61%.

On 3-year performance, CVY leads with 15.39% vs 1.13% for TLTW. On fees, TLTW is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, TLTW has been the lower-risk option at 2.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, CVY has performed better with a 15.39% return vs 1.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TLTW is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.21% for CVY.

TLTW has the higher dividend yield at 11.68%, compared with 3.65% for CVY.

CVY is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while TLTW is Derivative Income. CVY tracks Zacks Multi-Asset Income Index, while TLTW tracks CBOE TLT 2% OTM Buywrite Index (USD). They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.21% for CVY and 0.35% for TLTW.

CVY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CVY and TLTW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer