CVY vs. MFUL
CVY (Invesco Zacks Multi-Asset Income ETF) and MFUL (Mindful Conservative ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. CVY is passively managed, while MFUL is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, CVY returned 14.62%/yr vs 4.38%/yr for MFUL. Their 0.54 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. CVY charges 1.21%/yr vs 1.10%/yr for MFUL.
Performance
CVY vs. MFUL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CVY achieves a 15.51% return, which is significantly higher than MFUL's 2.75% return.
CVY
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- 3.22%
- 6M
- 10.58%
- YTD
- 15.51%
- 1Y
- 22.82%
- 3Y*
- 14.62%
- 5Y*
- 9.27%
- 10Y*
- 8.99%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.01%
MFUL
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- -0.18%
- 6M
- 1.42%
- YTD
- 2.75%
- 1Y
- 4.79%
- 3Y*
- 4.38%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -0.08%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $104.32K | $103.88K | $109.40K | |
| $6.81K | $15.69K | $11.16K |
CVY vs. MFUL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVY Invesco Zacks Multi-Asset Income ETF | 15.51% | 11.00% | 10.28% | 17.87% | -9.27% | -0.34% |
MFUL Mindful Conservative ETF | 2.75% | 4.51% | 5.36% | 2.24% | -12.46% | -1.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between CVY and MFUL is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2021 | 0.54 |
The correlation between CVY and MFUL shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (all time) to 0.67 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CVY vs. MFUL — Risk / Return Rank
CVY
MFUL
CVY vs. MFUL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Zacks Multi-Asset Income ETF (CVY) and Mindful Conservative ETF (MFUL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CVY | MFUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.20 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.92 | 1.38 | +1.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.01 | 4.99 | +5.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CVY vs. MFUL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CVY drawdown since its inception was -66.86%, which is greater than MFUL's maximum drawdown of -16.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVY and MFUL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CVY | MFUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.86% | -16.41% | -50.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.43% | -3.36% | -4.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.79% | -4.74% | -12.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.58% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.47% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.97% | -0.97% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.33% | -9.20% | -1.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.16% | 0.93% | +1.23% |
Volatility
CVY vs. MFUL - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Zacks Multi-Asset Income ETF (CVY) has a higher volatility of 3.00% compared to Mindful Conservative ETF (MFUL) at 1.07%. This indicates that CVY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MFUL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CVY | MFUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.00% | 1.07% | +1.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.79% | 3.58% | +4.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.82% | 4.31% | +6.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.06% | 4.27% | +11.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.46% | 4.27% | +15.19% |
CVY vs. MFUL - Expense Ratio Comparison
CVY has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than MFUL's 1.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
CVY vs. MFUL - Dividend Comparison
CVY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.11%, more than MFUL's 2.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVY Invesco Zacks Multi-Asset Income ETF | 4.11% | 3.99% | 4.07% | 4.41% | 5.18% | 2.37% | 3.40% | 3.22% | 4.44% | 3.94% | 4.50% | 5.89% |
MFUL Mindful Conservative ETF | 2.41% | 3.31% | 2.59% | 5.00% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CVY and MFUL have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CVY has higher volatility (3.00%) compared to MFUL (1.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CVY dropped -66.86% vs MFUL's -16.41%.
On 3-year performance, CVY leads with 14.62% vs 4.38% for MFUL. On fees, MFUL is cheaper at 1.10% per year. On volatility, MFUL has been the lower-risk option at 1.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, CVY has performed better with a 14.62% return vs 4.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MFUL is cheaper with a 1.10% expense ratio, compared with 1.21% for CVY.
CVY has the higher dividend yield at 4.11%, compared with 2.41% for MFUL.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Mohr. Their fees differ too: 1.21% for CVY and 1.10% for MFUL.
CVY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CVY and MFUL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer