CVY vs. MDAA
CVY (Invesco Zacks Multi-Asset Income ETF) and MDAA (Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. CVY is passively managed, while MDAA is actively managed. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CVY charges 1.21%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for MDAA.
Performance
CVY vs. MDAA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CVY achieves a 7.59% return, which is significantly lower than MDAA's 22.13% return.
CVY
- 1D
- -1.25%
- 1M
- 0.78%
- YTD
- 7.59%
- 6M
- 8.13%
- 1Y
- 17.25%
- 3Y*
- 15.33%
- 5Y*
- 7.04%
- 10Y*
- 8.41%
MDAA
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- 8.24%
- YTD
- 22.13%
- 6M
- 22.52%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CVY vs. MDAA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CVY Invesco Zacks Multi-Asset Income ETF | 7.59% | 0.62% |
MDAA Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF | 22.13% | -0.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between CVY and MDAA is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2025 | 0.51 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CVY vs. MDAA — Risk / Return Rank
CVY
MDAA
CVY vs. MDAA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Zacks Multi-Asset Income ETF (CVY) and Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF (MDAA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CVY | MDAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.58 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.31 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.33 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.82 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CVY | MDAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 1.47 | -1.19 |
Drawdowns
CVY vs. MDAA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CVY drawdown since its inception was -66.86%, which is greater than MDAA's maximum drawdown of -14.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVY and MDAA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CVY | MDAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.86% | -14.59% | -52.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.43% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.79% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.58% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.47% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.28% | -1.11% | -0.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.41% | -2.93% | -7.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.21% | — | — |
Volatility
CVY vs. MDAA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CVY | MDAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.87% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.81% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.00% | 23.89% | -12.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.20% | 23.89% | -7.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.56% | 23.89% | -4.33% |
CVY vs. MDAA - Expense Ratio Comparison
CVY has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than MDAA's 0.97% expense ratio.
Dividends
CVY vs. MDAA - Dividend Comparison
CVY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.75%, more than MDAA's 0.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVY Invesco Zacks Multi-Asset Income ETF | 3.75% | 3.99% | 4.07% | 4.41% | 5.18% | 2.37% | 3.40% | 3.22% | 4.44% | 3.94% | 4.50% | 5.89% |
MDAA Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF | 0.38% | 0.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CVY and MDAA have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MDAA is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MDAA is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.21% for CVY.
CVY has the higher dividend yield at 3.75%, compared with 0.38% for MDAA.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Myriad. Their fees differ too: 1.21% for CVY and 0.97% for MDAA.
Find the right allocation for CVY and MDAA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer