CVY vs. MDAA
CVY (Invesco Zacks Multi-Asset Income ETF) and MDAA (Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. CVY is passively managed, while MDAA is actively managed. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CVY charges 1.21%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for MDAA.
Performance
CVY vs. MDAA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CVY achieves a 14.19% return, which is significantly lower than MDAA's 15.21% return.
CVY
- 1D
- 0.79%
- 1M
- 3.52%
- 6M
- 9.34%
- YTD
- 14.19%
- 1Y
- 20.36%
- 3Y*
- 15.69%
- 5Y*
- 9.44%
- 10Y*
- 8.65%
MDAA
- 1D
- -1.55%
- 1M
- -3.50%
- 6M
- 9.73%
- YTD
- 15.21%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CVY vs. MDAA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CVY Invesco Zacks Multi-Asset Income ETF | 14.19% | 1.33% |
MDAA Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF | 15.21% | -0.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between CVY and MDAA is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2025 | 0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CVY vs. MDAA — Risk / Return Rank
CVY
MDAA
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CVY vs. MDAA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Zacks Multi-Asset Income ETF (CVY) and Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF (MDAA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CVY | MDAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.75 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.27 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CVY vs. MDAA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CVY drawdown since its inception was -66.86%, which is greater than MDAA's maximum drawdown of -14.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVY and MDAA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CVY | MDAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.86% | -14.59% | -52.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.43% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.79% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.58% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.47% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -6.71% | +6.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.35% | -3.27% | -7.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.20% | — | — |
Volatility
CVY vs. MDAA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CVY | MDAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.44% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.90% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.83% | 24.76% | -13.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.12% | 24.76% | -8.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.46% | 24.76% | -5.30% |
CVY vs. MDAA - Expense Ratio Comparison
CVY has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than MDAA's 0.97% expense ratio.
Dividends
CVY vs. MDAA - Dividend Comparison
CVY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.16%, more than MDAA's 0.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVY Invesco Zacks Multi-Asset Income ETF | 4.16% | 3.99% | 4.07% | 4.41% | 5.18% | 2.37% | 3.40% | 3.22% | 4.44% | 3.94% | 4.50% | 5.89% |
MDAA Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF | 0.40% | 0.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CVY and MDAA have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MDAA is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MDAA is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.21% for CVY.
CVY has the higher dividend yield at 4.16%, compared with 0.40% for MDAA.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Myriad. Their fees differ too: 1.21% for CVY and 0.97% for MDAA.
Find the right allocation for CVY and MDAA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer