CVSB vs. SLJY
CVSB (Calvert Ultra-Short Investment Grade ETF) and SLJY (Amplify SILJ Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CVSB is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Calvert, while SLJY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Amplify. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. CVSB charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for SLJY.
Performance
CVSB vs. SLJY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CVSB achieves a 1.48% return, which is significantly lower than SLJY's 7.71% return.
CVSB
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 1.48%
- 6M
- 2.03%
- 1Y
- 4.48%
- 3Y*
- 5.54%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SLJY
- 1D
- -4.01%
- 1M
- 3.34%
- YTD
- 7.71%
- 6M
- 15.56%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CVSB vs. SLJY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CVSB Calvert Ultra-Short Investment Grade ETF | 1.48% | 1.85% |
SLJY Amplify SILJ Covered Call ETF | 7.71% | 43.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between CVSB and SLJY is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2025 | -0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CVSB vs. SLJY — Risk / Return Rank
CVSB
SLJY
CVSB vs. SLJY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert Ultra-Short Investment Grade ETF (CVSB) and Amplify SILJ Covered Call ETF (SLJY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CVSB | SLJY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.38 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 19.85 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 80.53 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CVSB | SLJY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.12 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 4.13 | 1.49 | +2.64 |
Drawdowns
CVSB vs. SLJY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CVSB drawdown since its inception was -0.63%, smaller than the maximum SLJY drawdown of -30.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVSB and SLJY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CVSB | SLJY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.63% | -30.60% | +29.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.23% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.03% | -21.65% | +21.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.05% | -9.60% | +9.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.06% | — | — |
Volatility
CVSB vs. SLJY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CVSB | SLJY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.15% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.53% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88% | 49.59% | -48.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.32% | 49.59% | -48.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.32% | 49.59% | -48.27% |
CVSB vs. SLJY - Expense Ratio Comparison
CVSB has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than SLJY's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
CVSB vs. SLJY - Dividend Comparison
CVSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.37%, less than SLJY's 16.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CVSB Calvert Ultra-Short Investment Grade ETF | 4.37% | 4.72% | 5.13% | 4.95% |
SLJY Amplify SILJ Covered Call ETF | 16.71% | 6.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CVSB and SLJY have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CVSB is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CVSB is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for SLJY.
SLJY has the higher dividend yield at 16.71%, compared with 4.37% for CVSB.
CVSB is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while SLJY is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Calvert and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for CVSB and 0.75% for SLJY.
Find the right allocation for CVSB and SLJY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer