CVNX vs. QTAP

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

CVNX (Defiance Daily Target 2X Long CVNA ETF) and QTAP (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CVNX returned -27.67% vs 24.69% for QTAP. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CVNX charges 1.31%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QTAP.

Performance

CVNX vs. QTAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2X Long CVNA ETF (CVNX) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CVNX achieves a -46.52% return, which is significantly lower than QTAP's 14.12% return.

CVNX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 2.52%
• YTD: -46.52%
• 6M: -49.11%
• 1Y: -27.67%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QTAP

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: 0.23%
• YTD: 14.12%
• 6M: 14.21%
• 1Y: 24.69%
• 3Y*: 20.23%
• 5Y*: 12.97%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CVNX vs. QTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CVNX Defiance Daily Target 2X Long CVNA ETF	-46.52%	29.94%
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April	14.12%	10.46%

Correlation

The correlation between CVNX and QTAP is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.33
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2025	0.31

Return for Risk

CVNX vs. QTAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CVNX

CVNX Risk / Return Rank: 8
CVNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
CVNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
CVNX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
CVNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
CVNX Martin Ratio Rank: 6

QTAP

QTAP Risk / Return Rank: 97
QTAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
QTAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
QTAP Omega Ratio Rank: 98
QTAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
QTAP Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CVNX vs. QTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long CVNA ETF (CVNX) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CVNX	QTAP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.24	4.13	-4.37
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.45	6.96	-6.51
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	2.08	-1.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.40	9.96	-10.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.73	60.17	-60.90

CVNX vs. QTAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CVNX Sharpe Ratio is -0.24, which is lower than the QTAP Sharpe Ratio of 4.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CVNX and QTAP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CVNX vs. QTAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CVNX drawdown since its inception was -69.62%, which is greater than QTAP's maximum drawdown of -29.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVNX and QTAP.

Drawdown Indicators

	CVNX	QTAP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-69.62%	-29.44%	-40.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-69.62%	-2.49%	-67.13%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-13.03%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-29.44%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-57.59%	-0.57%	-57.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-30.69%	-5.00%	-25.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	38.05%	0.41%	+37.64%

Volatility

CVNX vs. QTAP - Volatility Comparison

Defiance Daily Target 2X Long CVNA ETF (CVNX) has a higher volatility of 26.57% compared to Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP) at 2.80%. This indicates that CVNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CVNX	QTAP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	26.57%	2.80%	+23.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	84.77%	4.78%	+79.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	116.97%	6.01%	+110.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	115.85%	18.91%	+96.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	115.85%	18.72%	+97.13%

CVNX vs. QTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

CVNX has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than QTAP's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

CVNX vs. QTAP - Dividend Comparison

Neither CVNX nor QTAP has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CVNX and QTAP in my portfolio?

CVNX and QTAP have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CVNX or QTAP?

CVNX has higher volatility (26.57%) compared to QTAP (2.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CVNX dropped -69.62% vs QTAP's -29.44%.

Which ETF is better, CVNX or QTAP?

On 1-year performance, QTAP leads with 24.69% vs -27.67% for CVNX. On fees, QTAP is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, QTAP has been the lower-risk option at 2.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CVNX or QTAP?

Over the 1-year period, QTAP has performed better with a 24.69% return vs -27.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CVNX or QTAP?

QTAP is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for CVNX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CVNX or QTAP?

CVNX and QTAP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between CVNX and QTAP?

They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for CVNX and 0.79% for QTAP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QTAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.13 vs -0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.