PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CVNX vs. QQQT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CVNX vs. QQQT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2X Long CVNA ETF (CVNX) and Defiance Nasdaq 100 Income Target ETF (QQQT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CVNX achieves a -51.18% return, which is significantly lower than QQQT's 13.60% return.


CVNX

1D
0.63%
1M
-30.08%
YTD
-51.18%
6M
-47.27%
1Y
-44.41%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QQQT

1D
-4.64%
1M
1.58%
YTD
13.60%
6M
11.34%
1Y
28.64%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CVNX vs. QQQT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CVNX and QQQT is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 30, 2025

0.39

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CVNX vs. QQQT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CVNX
CVNX Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
CVNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CVNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
CVNX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
CVNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
CVNX Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQT
QQQT Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
QQQT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQT Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQT Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CVNX vs. QQQT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long CVNA ETF (CVNX) and Defiance Nasdaq 100 Income Target ETF (QQQT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CVNXQQQTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.36

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.64

2.26

-2.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.22

7.90

-9.12

CVNX vs. QQQT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CVNX Sharpe Ratio is -0.38, which is lower than the QQQT Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CVNX and QQQT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CVNXQQQTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.38

1.88

-2.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.30

0.82

-1.13

Drawdowns

CVNX vs. QQQT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CVNX drawdown since its inception was -69.62%, which is greater than QQQT's maximum drawdown of -22.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVNX and QQQT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CVNXQQQTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.62%

-22.50%

-47.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-69.62%

-12.73%

-56.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-61.28%

-5.18%

-56.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.75%

-4.00%

-25.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

36.54%

3.63%

+32.91%

Volatility

CVNX vs. QQQT - Volatility Comparison

Defiance Daily Target 2X Long CVNA ETF (CVNX) has a higher volatility of 31.27% compared to Defiance Nasdaq 100 Income Target ETF (QQQT) at 6.31%. This indicates that CVNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CVNXQQQTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

31.27%

6.31%

+24.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

87.74%

12.21%

+75.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

118.64%

15.37%

+103.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

117.95%

20.49%

+97.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

117.95%

20.49%

+97.46%

CVNX vs. QQQT - Expense Ratio Comparison

CVNX has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQT's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

CVNX vs. QQQT - Dividend Comparison

CVNX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.15%.


PositionTTM20252024
CVNX
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long CVNA ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQQT
Defiance Nasdaq 100 Income Target ETF
20.15%21.27%10.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


CVNX and QQQT have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CVNX has higher volatility (31.27%) compared to QQQT (6.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CVNX dropped -69.62% vs QQQT's -22.50%.

On 1-year performance, QQQT leads with 28.64% vs -44.41% for CVNX. On fees, QQQT is cheaper at 1.05% per year. On volatility, QQQT has been the lower-risk option at 6.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QQQT has performed better with a 28.64% return vs -44.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQT is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for CVNX.

QQQT has the higher dividend yield at 20.15%, compared with 0.00% for CVNX.

CVNX is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while QQQT is Nasdaq-100. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for CVNX and 1.05% for QQQT.

QQQT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs -0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CVNX and QQQT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer