CVMIX vs. LZEMX
Compare and contrast key facts about Calvert Emerging Markets Equity Fund (CVMIX) and Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio (LZEMX).
CVMIX is managed by Calvert Research and Management. It was launched on Oct 30, 2012. LZEMX is managed by Lazard. It was launched on Jul 14, 1994.
Performance
CVMIX vs. LZEMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CVMIX vs. LZEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVMIX Calvert Emerging Markets Equity Fund | 2.82% | 36.77% | 6.37% | 4.74% | -22.57% | -7.43% | 24.88% | 22.65% | -15.23% | 44.71% |
LZEMX Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio | 6.61% | 41.35% | 7.60% | 22.44% | -14.86% | 5.37% | -0.07% | 18.06% | -18.11% | 28.02% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CVMIX achieves a 2.82% return, which is significantly lower than LZEMX's 6.61% return. Over the past 10 years, CVMIX has underperformed LZEMX with an annualized return of 8.11%, while LZEMX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.39% annualized return.
CVMIX
- 1D
- 3.23%
- 1M
- -10.51%
- YTD
- 2.82%
- 6M
- 9.44%
- 1Y
- 36.12%
- 3Y*
- 14.45%
- 5Y*
- 1.57%
- 10Y*
- 8.11%
LZEMX
- 1D
- 1.54%
- 1M
- -7.29%
- YTD
- 6.61%
- 6M
- 16.90%
- 1Y
- 40.50%
- 3Y*
- 22.54%
- 5Y*
- 11.01%
- 10Y*
- 9.39%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CVMIX vs. LZEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CVMIX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than LZEMX's 1.06% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CVMIX vs. LZEMX — Risk / Return Rank
CVMIX
LZEMX
CVMIX vs. LZEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert Emerging Markets Equity Fund (CVMIX) and Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio (LZEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CVMIX | LZEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.88 | 2.95 | -1.07 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.46 | 3.72 | -1.27 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.57 | -0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.40 | 3.86 | -1.46 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.41 | 14.21 | -3.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CVMIX | LZEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.88 | 2.95 | -1.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 | 0.78 | -0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 | 0.58 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.39 | -0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between CVMIX and LZEMX is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CVMIX vs. LZEMX - Dividend Comparison
CVMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%, more than LZEMX's 1.92% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVMIX Calvert Emerging Markets Equity Fund | 2.19% | 2.26% | 0.63% | 0.92% | 0.79% | 0.76% | 0.41% | 0.68% | 1.24% | 0.27% | 0.84% | 1.26% |
LZEMX Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio | 1.92% | 2.05% | 3.11% | 3.76% | 5.92% | 4.89% | 2.11% | 2.45% | 2.10% | 1.99% | 1.48% | 2.14% |
Drawdowns
CVMIX vs. LZEMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CVMIX drawdown since its inception was -43.96%, smaller than the maximum LZEMX drawdown of -60.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVMIX and LZEMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CVMIX | LZEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.96% | -60.08% | +16.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.95% | -10.42% | -4.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.71% | -30.55% | -10.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.96% | -44.08% | +0.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.20% | -9.04% | -3.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.38% | -16.71% | +2.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.45% | 2.89% | +0.56% |
Volatility
CVMIX vs. LZEMX - Volatility Comparison
Calvert Emerging Markets Equity Fund (CVMIX) has a higher volatility of 10.67% compared to Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio (LZEMX) at 6.23%. This indicates that CVMIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LZEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CVMIX | LZEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.67% | 6.23% | +4.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.07% | 9.72% | +5.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.62% | 14.30% | +5.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.86% | 14.11% | +3.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.15% | 16.34% | +1.81% |