PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CVLT vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CVLT vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Commvault Systems, Inc. (CVLT) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CVLT vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CVLT
Commvault Systems, Inc.
-37.45%-16.93%88.99%27.07%-8.82%24.47%24.04%-24.45%12.55%2.14%
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
-3.95%16.39%23.31%24.23%-19.44%26.89%16.26%28.88%-6.24%19.42%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CVLT achieves a -37.45% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's -3.95% return. Over the past 10 years, CVLT has underperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of 6.06%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively higher 12.24% annualized return.


CVLT

1D
0.67%
1M
-8.09%
YTD
-37.45%
6M
-57.82%
1Y
-51.88%
3Y*
11.39%
5Y*
3.47%
10Y*
6.06%

^GSPC

1D
0.72%
1M
-4.45%
YTD
-3.95%
6M
-2.02%
1Y
16.73%
3Y*
16.96%
5Y*
10.34%
10Y*
12.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CVLT vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CVLT
CVLT Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
CVLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CVLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
CVLT Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
CVLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
CVLT Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CVLT vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Commvault Systems, Inc. (CVLT) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CVLT^GSPCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.92

0.92

-1.84

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.22

1.41

-2.64

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.81

1.21

-0.41

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.82

1.41

-2.23

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.65

6.61

-8.26

CVLT vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CVLT Sharpe Ratio is -0.92, which is lower than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CVLT and ^GSPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CVLT^GSPCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.92

0.92

-1.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

0.61

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

0.68

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.20

0.46

-0.26

Correlation

The correlation between CVLT and ^GSPC is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Drawdowns

CVLT vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CVLT drawdown since its inception was -68.89%, which is greater than ^GSPC's maximum drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVLT and ^GSPC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CVLT^GSPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.89%

-56.78%

-12.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-61.53%

-12.14%

-49.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.53%

-25.43%

-36.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.53%

-33.92%

-27.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-59.87%

-5.78%

-54.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.71%

-10.75%

-15.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

30.57%

2.60%

+27.97%

Volatility

CVLT vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

Commvault Systems, Inc. (CVLT) has a higher volatility of 11.54% compared to S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) at 5.37%. This indicates that CVLT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CVLT^GSPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.54%

5.37%

+6.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

48.50%

9.55%

+38.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

56.39%

18.33%

+38.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.56%

16.90%

+24.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.16%

18.05%

+19.11%