CVLT vs. G

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Commvault Systems, Inc. (CVLT) and Genpact Limited (G).

Performance

CVLT vs. G - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Commvault Systems, Inc. (CVLT) and Genpact Limited (G). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CVLT vs. G - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CVLT Commvault Systems, Inc.	-37.87%	-16.93%	88.99%	27.07%	-8.82%	24.47%	24.04%	-24.45%	12.55%	2.14%
G Genpact Limited	-19.98%	10.56%	25.78%	-23.98%	-11.74%	29.51%	-0.93%	57.66%	-14.12%	31.54%

Fundamentals

Market Cap CVLT : $3.47B G : $6.52B
EPS CVLT : $1.93 G : $3.14
PE Ratio CVLT : 40.31 G : 11.87
PEG Ratio CVLT : 0.09 G : 0.67
PS Ratio CVLT : 3.06 G : 1.29
PB Ratio CVLT : 16.03 G : 2.56
Total Revenue (TTM) CVLT : $1.15B G : $5.08B
Gross Profit (TTM) CVLT : $934.16M G : $1.83B
EBITDA (TTM) CVLT : $107.51M G : $855.28M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CVLT achieves a -37.87% return, which is significantly lower than G's -19.98% return. Over the past 10 years, CVLT has outperformed G with an annualized return of 5.99%, while G has yielded a comparatively lower 4.15% annualized return.

CVLT

• 1D: 3.60%
• 1M: -8.45%
• YTD: -37.87%
• 6M: -58.74%
• 1Y: -50.63%
• 3Y*: 11.14%
• 5Y*: 3.33%
• 10Y*: 5.99%

G

• 1D: -0.53%
• 1M: -5.76%
• YTD: -19.98%
• 6M: -10.31%
• 1Y: -24.83%
• 3Y*: -5.45%
• 5Y*: -1.58%
• 10Y*: 4.15%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CVLT vs. G — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CVLT

CVLT Risk / Return Rank: 8
CVLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
CVLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
CVLT Omega Ratio Rank: 7
CVLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
CVLT Martin Ratio Rank: 5

G

G Risk / Return Rank: 11
G Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
G Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
G Omega Ratio Rank: 12
G Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
G Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CVLT vs. G - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Commvault Systems, Inc. (CVLT) and Genpact Limited (G). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CVLT	G	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.90	-0.69	-0.21
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-1.17	-0.85	-0.32
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.82	0.88	-0.06
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.84	-0.89	+0.04
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.71	-1.62	-0.09
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CVLT vs. G - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CVLT Sharpe Ratio is -0.90, which is comparable to the G Sharpe Ratio of -0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CVLT and G, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CVLT	G	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.90	-0.69	-0.21
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.08	-0.06	+0.14
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.16	0.15	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.20	0.18	+0.01

Correlation

The correlation between CVLT and G is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CVLT vs. G - Dividend Comparison

CVLT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while G's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CVLT Commvault Systems, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
G Genpact Limited	1.87%	1.45%	1.42%	1.58%	1.08%	0.81%	0.94%	0.81%	1.11%	0.76%

Drawdowns

CVLT vs. G - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CVLT drawdown since its inception was -68.89%, which is greater than G's maximum drawdown of -64.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVLT and G.

Drawdown Indicators

	CVLT	G	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-68.89%	-64.14%	-4.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-61.53%	-27.35%	-34.18%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-61.53%	-41.31%	-20.22%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-61.53%	-49.47%	-12.06%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-60.14%	-31.58%	-28.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-26.70%	-15.29%	-11.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	30.33%	14.95%	+15.38%

Volatility

CVLT vs. G - Volatility Comparison

Commvault Systems, Inc. (CVLT) has a higher volatility of 11.75% compared to Genpact Limited (G) at 7.76%. This indicates that CVLT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than G based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CVLT	G	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.75%	7.76%	+3.99%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	48.51%	26.62%	+21.89%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	56.43%	35.87%	+20.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	41.57%	27.88%	+13.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	37.17%	27.64%	+9.53%

Financials

CVLT vs. G - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Commvault Systems, Inc. and Genpact Limited over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

CVLT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Commvault Systems, Inc. reported a gross profit of 254.54M and revenue of 313.83M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.1%.

G - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Genpact Limited reported a gross profit of 482.29M and revenue of 1.32B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.6%.

CVLT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Commvault Systems, Inc. reported an operating income of 19.77M and revenue of 313.83M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.3%.

G - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Genpact Limited reported an operating income of 195.46M and revenue of 1.32B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.8%.

CVLT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Commvault Systems, Inc. reported a net income of 17.78M and revenue of 313.83M, resulting in a net margin of 5.7%.

G - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Genpact Limited reported a net income of 143.09M and revenue of 1.32B, resulting in a net margin of 10.9%.