PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CVLC vs. GLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CVLC vs. GLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVLC) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CVLC vs. GLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CVLC
Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF
-4.76%16.13%24.20%17.14%
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
8.57%63.68%26.66%5.23%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CVLC achieves a -4.76% return, which is significantly lower than GLD's 8.57% return.


CVLC

1D
3.04%
1M
-5.40%
YTD
-4.76%
6M
-1.68%
1Y
17.36%
3Y*
17.40%
5Y*
10Y*

GLD

1D
3.79%
1M
-11.05%
YTD
8.57%
6M
21.05%
1Y
49.33%
3Y*
32.92%
5Y*
21.58%
10Y*
13.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CVLC vs. GLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

CVLC has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than GLD's 0.40% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CVLC vs. GLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CVLC
CVLC Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
CVLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CVLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
CVLC Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
CVLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
CVLC Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

GLD
GLD Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
GLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLD Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
GLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLD Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CVLC vs. GLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVLC) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CVLCGLDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.93

1.79

-0.86

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.44

2.21

-0.77

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.33

-0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.44

2.68

-1.24

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.70

9.90

-3.21

CVLC vs. GLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CVLC Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is lower than the GLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CVLC and GLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CVLCGLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

1.79

-0.86

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.04

0.62

+0.42

Correlation

The correlation between CVLC and GLD is 0.08, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

CVLC vs. GLD - Dividend Comparison

CVLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, while GLD has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM202520242023
CVLC
Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF
1.05%1.02%1.03%0.91%
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

CVLC vs. GLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CVLC drawdown since its inception was -19.92%, smaller than the maximum GLD drawdown of -45.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVLC and GLD.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CVLCGLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.92%

-45.56%

+25.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.46%

-19.21%

+6.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.86%

-13.23%

+6.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.49%

-16.17%

+13.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.67%

5.20%

-2.53%

Volatility

CVLC vs. GLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVLC) is 5.63%, while SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) has a volatility of 11.06%. This indicates that CVLC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CVLCGLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.63%

11.06%

-5.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.84%

24.30%

-14.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.84%

27.80%

-8.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.68%

17.74%

-2.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.68%

15.87%

-0.19%