CVISX vs. BCSVX
Compare and contrast key facts about Causeway International Small Cap Fund (CVISX) and Brown Capital Management International Small Company Fund (BCSVX).
CVISX is managed by Causeway. It was launched on Oct 19, 2014. BCSVX is managed by Brown Capital Management. It was launched on Sep 29, 2015.
Performance
CVISX vs. BCSVX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CVISX vs. BCSVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVISX Causeway International Small Cap Fund | 4.10% | 32.93% | 9.71% | 26.74% | -11.51% | 21.30% | 2.48% | 18.55% | -21.34% | 34.52% |
BCSVX Brown Capital Management International Small Company Fund | -21.07% | -2.30% | 8.17% | 20.04% | -31.56% | 12.69% | 44.75% | 26.41% | -3.39% | 36.56% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CVISX achieves a 4.10% return, which is significantly higher than BCSVX's -21.07% return. Over the past 10 years, CVISX has outperformed BCSVX with an annualized return of 10.79%, while BCSVX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.88% annualized return.
CVISX
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- -10.77%
- YTD
- 4.10%
- 6M
- 8.85%
- 1Y
- 35.37%
- 3Y*
- 22.86%
- 5Y*
- 13.00%
- 10Y*
- 10.79%
BCSVX
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- -10.50%
- YTD
- -21.07%
- 6M
- -29.40%
- 1Y
- -18.89%
- 3Y*
- -1.98%
- 5Y*
- -4.61%
- 10Y*
- 6.88%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CVISX vs. BCSVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CVISX has a 1.35% expense ratio, which is higher than BCSVX's 1.31% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CVISX vs. BCSVX — Risk / Return Rank
CVISX
BCSVX
CVISX vs. BCSVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Causeway International Small Cap Fund (CVISX) and Brown Capital Management International Small Company Fund (BCSVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CVISX | BCSVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.23 | -1.07 | +3.30 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.74 | -1.46 | +4.19 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 0.82 | +0.59 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.70 | -0.60 | +3.30 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.15 | -1.51 | +11.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CVISX | BCSVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.23 | -1.07 | +3.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 | -0.25 | +1.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 | 0.41 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.38 | +0.22 |
Correlation
The correlation between CVISX and BCSVX is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
CVISX vs. BCSVX - Dividend Comparison
CVISX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.91%, more than BCSVX's 0.47% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVISX Causeway International Small Cap Fund | 15.91% | 16.56% | 10.60% | 6.14% | 2.75% | 3.48% | 3.42% | 3.57% | 2.91% | 8.23% | 2.78% | 2.00% |
BCSVX Brown Capital Management International Small Company Fund | 0.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.07% | 0.74% | 0.30% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CVISX vs. BCSVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CVISX drawdown since its inception was -48.50%, which is greater than BCSVX's maximum drawdown of -43.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVISX and BCSVX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CVISX | BCSVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.50% | -43.93% | -4.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.77% | -32.35% | +21.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.20% | -43.93% | +18.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.50% | -43.93% | -4.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.77% | -34.25% | +23.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.99% | -11.85% | +2.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.17% | 12.98% | -9.81% |
Volatility
CVISX vs. BCSVX - Volatility Comparison
Causeway International Small Cap Fund (CVISX) has a higher volatility of 6.46% compared to Brown Capital Management International Small Company Fund (BCSVX) at 6.12%. This indicates that CVISX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BCSVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CVISX | BCSVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.46% | 6.12% | +0.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.96% | 11.91% | -0.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.35% | 17.67% | -2.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.01% | 18.43% | -2.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.75% | 16.94% | -0.19% |