PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CVIE vs. FRDM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CVIE vs. FRDM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calvert International Responsible Index ETF (CVIE) and Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF (FRDM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CVIE vs. FRDM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CVIE
Calvert International Responsible Index ETF
2.02%33.23%5.37%8.48%
FRDM
Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF
7.05%61.27%1.70%9.63%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CVIE achieves a 2.02% return, which is significantly lower than FRDM's 7.05% return.


CVIE

1D
3.71%
1M
-9.22%
YTD
2.02%
6M
8.00%
1Y
29.10%
3Y*
16.24%
5Y*
10Y*

FRDM

1D
4.49%
1M
-12.64%
YTD
7.05%
6M
24.68%
1Y
59.74%
3Y*
26.32%
5Y*
12.99%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CVIE vs. FRDM - Expense Ratio Comparison

CVIE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than FRDM's 0.49% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CVIE vs. FRDM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CVIE
CVIE Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
CVIE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CVIE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
CVIE Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
CVIE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
CVIE Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

FRDM
FRDM Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
FRDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRDM Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
FRDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRDM Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CVIE vs. FRDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert International Responsible Index ETF (CVIE) and Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF (FRDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CVIEFRDMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.61

2.55

-0.94

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.22

3.15

-0.93

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.47

-0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.22

3.52

-1.30

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.95

14.69

-5.74

CVIE vs. FRDM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CVIE Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is lower than the FRDM Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CVIE and FRDM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CVIEFRDMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.61

2.55

-0.94

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.01

0.66

+0.35

Correlation

The correlation between CVIE and FRDM is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

CVIE vs. FRDM - Dividend Comparison

CVIE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%, more than FRDM's 2.04% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
CVIE
Calvert International Responsible Index ETF
2.59%2.85%2.78%1.96%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FRDM
Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF
2.04%2.26%2.53%2.66%2.72%2.17%1.11%1.07%

Drawdowns

CVIE vs. FRDM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CVIE drawdown since its inception was -13.52%, smaller than the maximum FRDM drawdown of -40.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVIE and FRDM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CVIEFRDMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.52%

-40.49%

+26.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.71%

-16.87%

+4.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.47%

-13.13%

+3.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.66%

-7.21%

+4.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.15%

4.04%

-0.89%

Volatility

CVIE vs. FRDM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Calvert International Responsible Index ETF (CVIE) is 8.83%, while Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF (FRDM) has a volatility of 13.19%. This indicates that CVIE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FRDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CVIEFRDMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.83%

13.19%

-4.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.28%

18.31%

-6.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.15%

23.57%

-5.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.92%

20.00%

-5.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.92%

22.36%

-7.44%