PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
CVD.TO vs. LUG.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

CVD.TO vs. LUG.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CVD.TO (iShares Convertible Bond Index ETF) is High Yield Bonds fund tracking the FTSE Canada Convertible Bond Index, while LUG.TO (Lundin Gold Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, CVD.TO returned 4.53%/yr vs 32.52%/yr for LUG.TO. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

CVD.TO vs. LUG.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Convertible Bond Index ETF (CVD.TO) and Lundin Gold Inc. (LUG.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CVD.TO achieves a 3.23% return, which is significantly higher than LUG.TO's -22.95% return. Over the past 10 years, CVD.TO has underperformed LUG.TO with an annualized return of 4.53%, while LUG.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 32.52% annualized return.

CVD.TO

1D
-0.28%
1M
0.49%
YTD
3.23%
6M
0.06%
1Y
7.61%
3Y*
7.90%
5Y*
4.33%
10Y*
4.53%

LUG.TO

1D
-3.33%
1M
-1.23%
YTD
-22.95%
6M
-19.78%
1Y
30.84%
3Y*
79.81%
5Y*
54.77%
10Y*
32.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CVD.TO vs. LUG.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CVD.TO
iShares Convertible Bond Index ETF		3.23%7.09%12.68%3.64%-4.63%5.33%3.67%10.28%-2.68%4.06%
LUG.TO
Lundin Gold Inc.		-22.95%291.32%91.60%29.57%30.62%-4.67%31.21%66.93%10.15%-13.88%

Correlation

The correlation between CVD.TO and LUG.TO is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2011

0.03

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Convertible Bond Index ETF

Lundin Gold Inc.

Often compared with CVD.TO:
CVD.TO vs. ZWC.TOCVD.TO vs. ICVTCVD.TO vs. XHY.TOCVD.TO vs. CGHY.TOCVD.TO vs. XHB.TOCVD.TO vs. XEQT.TOCVD.TO vs. XSB.TO
Often compared with LUG.TO:
LUG.TO vs. AEMLUG.TO vs. EGOLUG.TO vs. MAGLUG.TO vs. KGCLUG.TO vs. CGAULUG.TO vs. NVDA.TOLUG.TO vs. KNT.TO

Return for Risk

CVD.TO vs. LUG.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
CVD.TO
CVD.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
CVD.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CVD.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
CVD.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
CVD.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
CVD.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
LUG.TO
LUG.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
LUG.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LUG.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
LUG.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
LUG.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
LUG.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CVD.TO vs. LUG.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Convertible Bond Index ETF (CVD.TO) and Lundin Gold Inc. (LUG.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

CVD.TOLUG.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.05
0.56

+0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.48
1.07

+0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.14

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.93

0.92

+1.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.61

2.38

+3.23

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CVD.TO vs. LUG.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CVD.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is higher than the LUG.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CVD.TO and LUG.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

CVD.TOLUG.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.05

0.56

+0.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

1.19

-0.72

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.75

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.00

+0.46

Drawdowns

CVD.TO vs. LUG.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CVD.TO drawdown since its inception was -23.51%, smaller than the maximum LUG.TO drawdown of -95.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVD.TO and LUG.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

CVD.TOLUG.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.51%

-95.00%

+71.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.95%

-33.77%

+29.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.47%

-33.77%

+22.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.62%

-38.94%

+24.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.51%

-41.84%

+18.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.00%

-31.67%

+29.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.39%

-64.97%

+62.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.36%

13.00%

-11.64%

Volatility

CVD.TO vs. LUG.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Convertible Bond Index ETF (CVD.TO) is 0.95%, while Lundin Gold Inc. (LUG.TO) has a volatility of 17.64%. This indicates that CVD.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LUG.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

CVD.TOLUG.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.95%

17.64%

-16.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.52%

40.97%

-35.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.29%

55.44%

-48.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.25%

46.37%

-37.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.43%

43.36%

-33.93%

Dividends

CVD.TO vs. LUG.TO - Dividend Comparison

CVD.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.95%, less than LUG.TO's 5.09% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CVD.TO
iShares Convertible Bond Index ETF		4.95%4.91%5.14%5.33%5.05%4.61%4.48%4.52%4.97%4.65%4.51%4.94%
LUG.TO
Lundin Gold Inc.		5.09%3.37%2.69%3.28%1.97%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

CVD.TO and LUG.TO have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CVD.TO and LUG.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer