PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CUV.AX vs. BABA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CUV.AX vs. BABA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a A$10,000 investment in Clinuvel Pharmaceuticals Limited (CUV.AX) and Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CUV.AX is traded in AUD, while BABA is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BABA values have been converted to AUD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CUV.AX achieves a -29.13% return, which is significantly lower than BABA's -18.76% return. Over the past 10 years, CUV.AX has outperformed BABA with an annualized return of 7.01%, while BABA has yielded a comparatively lower 6.10% annualized return.


CUV.AX

1D
-1.89%
1M
-4.54%
YTD
-29.13%
6M
-27.38%
1Y
-10.38%
3Y*
-21.15%
5Y*
-20.83%
10Y*
7.01%

BABA

1D
-2.31%
1M
-4.03%
YTD
-18.76%
6M
-25.48%
1Y
2.04%
3Y*
13.78%
5Y*
-7.86%
10Y*
6.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CUV.AX vs. BABA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CUV.AX
Clinuvel Pharmaceuticals Limited
-29.13%3.82%-24.38%-25.96%-20.20%21.99%-21.45%57.33%121.24%9.93%
BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Limited
-18.76%63.03%23.02%-10.76%-20.94%-45.97%0.09%55.46%-11.98%81.41%

Correlation

The correlation between CUV.AX and BABA is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2014

0.03

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CUV.AX vs. BABA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CUV.AX
CUV.AX Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
CUV.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CUV.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
CUV.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
CUV.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
CUV.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

BABA
BABA Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
BABA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BABA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
BABA Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
BABA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
BABA Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CUV.AX vs. BABA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Clinuvel Pharmaceuticals Limited (CUV.AX) and Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CUV.AXBABADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.04

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.29

0.05

-0.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.53

0.10

-0.63

CUV.AX vs. BABA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CUV.AX Sharpe Ratio is -0.23, which is lower than the BABA Sharpe Ratio of 0.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CUV.AX and BABA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CUV.AXBABADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.23

0.05

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.44

-0.16

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

0.15

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.13

0.13

0.00

Drawdowns

CUV.AX vs. BABA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CUV.AX drawdown since its inception was -92.52%, which is greater than BABA's maximum drawdown of -77.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CUV.AX and BABA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CUV.AXBABADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.52%

-77.79%

-14.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.53%

-40.18%

+4.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-58.28%

-40.18%

-18.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-79.57%

-67.60%

-11.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.18%

-77.79%

-2.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-80.08%

-57.80%

-22.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-56.63%

-34.25%

-22.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.39%

21.23%

-1.84%

Volatility

CUV.AX vs. BABA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Clinuvel Pharmaceuticals Limited (CUV.AX) is 8.82%, while Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) has a volatility of 13.92%. This indicates that CUV.AX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BABA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CUV.AXBABADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.82%

13.92%

-5.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.00%

27.72%

+3.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.40%

41.91%

+2.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

46.91%

48.37%

-1.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

52.81%

41.22%

+11.59%

Dividends

CUV.AX vs. BABA - Dividend Comparison

CUV.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, less than BABA's 1.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Limited
1.57%1.36%1.96%1.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CUV.AX
Clinuvel Pharmaceuticals Limited
0.57%0.40%0.41%0.31%0.18%0.09%0.11%0.09%0.11%

Financials

CUV.AX vs. BABA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Clinuvel Pharmaceuticals Limited and Alibaba Group Holding Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. CUV.AX values in AUD, BABA values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


CUV.AX and BABA have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CUV.AX and BABA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer