PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CUSUX vs. CMEUX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CUSUX vs. CMEUX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Six Circles U.S. Unconstrained Equity Fund (CUSUX) and Six Circles Managed Equity Portfolio U.S. Unconstrained Fund (CMEUX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CUSUX achieves a 9.20% return, which is significantly lower than CMEUX's 12.07% return.


CUSUX

1D
0.29%
1M
6.45%
YTD
9.20%
6M
9.19%
1Y
27.90%
3Y*
22.36%
5Y*
13.42%
10Y*

CMEUX

1D
0.26%
1M
6.50%
YTD
12.07%
6M
11.78%
1Y
31.28%
3Y*
23.21%
5Y*
14.37%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CUSUX vs. CMEUX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
CUSUX
Six Circles U.S. Unconstrained Equity Fund
9.20%19.35%24.86%30.38%-21.28%30.27%22.69%10.21%
CMEUX
Six Circles Managed Equity Portfolio U.S. Unconstrained Fund
12.07%18.38%24.94%29.09%-20.29%26.65%29.12%12.13%

Correlation

The correlation between CUSUX and CMEUX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 17, 2019

0.97

The correlation between CUSUX and CMEUX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CUSUX vs. CMEUX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CUSUX
CUSUX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
CUSUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CUSUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
CUSUX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
CUSUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
CUSUX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

CMEUX
CMEUX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
CMEUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMEUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMEUX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
CMEUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMEUX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CUSUX vs. CMEUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Six Circles U.S. Unconstrained Equity Fund (CUSUX) and Six Circles Managed Equity Portfolio U.S. Unconstrained Fund (CMEUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CUSUXCMEUXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.48

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.62

3.40

-0.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.51

14.99

-4.48

CUSUX vs. CMEUX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CUSUX Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is comparable to the CMEUX Sharpe Ratio of 2.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CUSUX and CMEUX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CUSUXCMEUXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.40

2.65

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.81

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

0.88

-0.18

Drawdowns

CUSUX vs. CMEUX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CUSUX drawdown since its inception was -35.55%, which is greater than CMEUX's maximum drawdown of -28.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CUSUX and CMEUX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CUSUXCMEUXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.55%

-28.39%

-7.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.01%

-9.51%

-1.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.64%

-19.91%

+0.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.55%

-25.61%

-9.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.64%

-5.34%

-3.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.73%

2.15%

+0.58%

Volatility

CUSUX vs. CMEUX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Six Circles U.S. Unconstrained Equity Fund (CUSUX) is 2.62%, while Six Circles Managed Equity Portfolio U.S. Unconstrained Fund (CMEUX) has a volatility of 2.79%. This indicates that CUSUX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMEUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CUSUXCMEUXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.62%

2.79%

-0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.10%

9.21%

-0.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.99%

12.19%

-0.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.75%

17.94%

+2.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.53%

19.96%

+1.57%

CUSUX vs. CMEUX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CUSUX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than CMEUX's 0.07% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CUSUX vs. CMEUX - Dividend Comparison

CUSUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.41%, more than CMEUX's 0.90% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
CMEUX
Six Circles Managed Equity Portfolio U.S. Unconstrained Fund
0.90%1.01%1.02%1.16%1.52%4.12%3.33%1.72%
CUSUX
Six Circles U.S. Unconstrained Equity Fund
8.41%9.18%6.64%1.19%2.68%16.48%1.55%1.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, CUSUX and CMEUX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

CMEUX has higher volatility (2.79%) compared to CUSUX (2.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CUSUX dropped -35.55% vs CMEUX's -28.39%.

CMEUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 2.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CUSUX and CMEUX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer