PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CMEUX vs. FMCSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CMEUX vs. FMCSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Six Circles Managed Equity Portfolio U.S. Unconstrained Fund (CMEUX) and Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock Fund (FMCSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMEUX achieves a 8.74% return, which is significantly lower than FMCSX's 14.84% return.


CMEUX

1D
1.85%
1M
-0.60%
6M
7.85%
YTD
8.74%
1Y
20.95%
3Y*
19.08%
5Y*
12.19%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
16.45%

FMCSX

1D
1.17%
1M
-3.33%
6M
11.06%
YTD
14.84%
1Y
23.84%
3Y*
14.66%
5Y*
10.38%
10Y*
12.33%
ALL TIME*
11.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

CMEUX vs. FMCSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
CMEUX
Six Circles Managed Equity Portfolio U.S. Unconstrained Fund
8.74%18.38%24.94%29.09%-20.29%26.65%29.12%12.13%
FMCSX
Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock Fund
14.84%11.80%14.55%11.02%-6.40%28.64%11.43%9.48%

Correlation

The correlation between CMEUX and FMCSX is 0.76, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2019

0.76

The correlation between CMEUX and FMCSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CMEUX vs. FMCSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CMEUX
CMEUX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
CMEUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMEUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMEUX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
CMEUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMEUX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

FMCSX
FMCSX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
FMCSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMCSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMCSX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
FMCSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMCSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CMEUX vs. FMCSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Six Circles Managed Equity Portfolio U.S. Unconstrained Fund (CMEUX) and Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock Fund (FMCSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CMEUXFMCSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.23

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.97

2.51

-0.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.75

8.76

-1.00

CMEUX vs. FMCSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMEUX Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is comparable to the FMCSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMEUX and FMCSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CMEUX vs. FMCSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMEUX drawdown since its inception was -28.39%, smaller than the maximum FMCSX drawdown of -62.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMEUX and FMCSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CMEUXFMCSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.39%

-62.19%

+33.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.51%

-8.55%

-0.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.91%

-22.33%

+2.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.61%

-22.33%

-3.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.98%

-5.29%

+2.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.27%

-9.32%

+4.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.41%

2.46%

-0.05%

Volatility

CMEUX vs. FMCSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Six Circles Managed Equity Portfolio U.S. Unconstrained Fund (CMEUX) is 3.47%, while Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock Fund (FMCSX) has a volatility of 4.28%. This indicates that CMEUX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FMCSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CMEUXFMCSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.47%

4.28%

-0.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.42%

13.15%

-2.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.33%

16.59%

-3.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.07%

17.74%

+0.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.87%

18.56%

+1.31%

CMEUX vs. FMCSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CMEUX has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than FMCSX's 0.62% expense ratio.


Dividends

CMEUX vs. FMCSX - Dividend Comparison

CMEUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, less than FMCSX's 5.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CMEUX
Six Circles Managed Equity Portfolio U.S. Unconstrained Fund
0.93%1.01%1.02%1.16%1.52%4.12%3.33%1.72%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FMCSX
Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock Fund
5.40%1.83%8.94%2.60%5.44%12.80%6.72%6.63%18.48%6.66%8.25%14.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


CMEUX and FMCSX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FMCSX has higher volatility (4.28%) compared to CMEUX (3.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CMEUX dropped -28.39% vs FMCSX's -62.19%.

CMEUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CMEUX and FMCSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer