PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CUSUX vs. VOOV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CUSUX vs. VOOV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Six Circles U.S. Unconstrained Equity Fund (CUSUX) and Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF (VOOV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CUSUX achieves a 8.88% return, which is significantly higher than VOOV's 7.51% return.


CUSUX

1D
0.34%
1M
5.71%
YTD
8.88%
6M
9.30%
1Y
28.18%
3Y*
22.25%
5Y*
13.30%
10Y*

VOOV

1D
-0.40%
1M
2.22%
YTD
7.51%
6M
7.76%
1Y
21.33%
3Y*
15.68%
5Y*
10.64%
10Y*
11.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CUSUX vs. VOOV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
CUSUX
Six Circles U.S. Unconstrained Equity Fund
8.88%19.35%24.86%30.38%-21.28%30.27%22.69%24.95%-11.01%
VOOV
Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF
7.51%13.10%12.21%22.15%-5.37%24.87%1.23%31.75%-10.21%

Correlation

The correlation between CUSUX and VOOV is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2018

0.80

The correlation between CUSUX and VOOV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CUSUX vs. VOOV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CUSUX
CUSUX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
CUSUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CUSUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
CUSUX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
CUSUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
CUSUX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

VOOV
VOOV Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
VOOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOOV Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
VOOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOOV Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CUSUX vs. VOOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Six Circles U.S. Unconstrained Equity Fund (CUSUX) and Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF (VOOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CUSUXVOOVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.42

2.18

+0.24

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.30

3.04

+0.26

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.39

+0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.67

3.42

-0.74

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.78

13.04

-2.26

CUSUX vs. VOOV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CUSUX Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is comparable to the VOOV Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CUSUX and VOOV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CUSUXVOOVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.42

2.18

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.74

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.75

-0.06

Drawdowns

CUSUX vs. VOOV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CUSUX drawdown since its inception was -35.55%, roughly equal to the maximum VOOV drawdown of -37.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CUSUX and VOOV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CUSUXVOOVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.55%

-37.31%

+1.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.01%

-6.27%

-4.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.64%

-17.55%

-2.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.55%

-18.10%

-17.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.52%

+0.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.64%

-3.84%

-4.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.73%

1.64%

+1.09%

Volatility

CUSUX vs. VOOV - Volatility Comparison

Six Circles U.S. Unconstrained Equity Fund (CUSUX) has a higher volatility of 2.62% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF (VOOV) at 2.01%. This indicates that CUSUX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CUSUXVOOVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.62%

2.01%

+0.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.11%

7.06%

+2.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.01%

9.83%

+2.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.75%

14.45%

+6.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.54%

16.95%

+4.59%

CUSUX vs. VOOV - Expense Ratio Comparison

CUSUX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than VOOV's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CUSUX vs. VOOV - Dividend Comparison

CUSUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.43%, more than VOOV's 1.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CUSUX
Six Circles U.S. Unconstrained Equity Fund
8.43%9.18%6.64%1.19%2.68%16.48%1.55%1.67%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOOV
Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF
1.68%1.76%2.10%1.69%2.19%1.87%2.45%2.10%2.65%2.13%2.24%2.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


CUSUX and VOOV have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CUSUX has higher volatility (2.62%) compared to VOOV (2.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CUSUX dropped -35.55% vs VOOV's -37.31%.

CUSUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CUSUX and VOOV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer