PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CUSD vs. BILZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CUSD vs. BILZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CrossingBridge Ultra-Short Duration ETF (CUSD) and PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund (BILZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CUSD vs. BILZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CUSD
CrossingBridge Ultra-Short Duration ETF
1.37%5.02%4.57%2.82%
BILZ
PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund
0.84%4.21%5.25%2.33%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CUSD achieves a 1.37% return, which is significantly higher than BILZ's 0.84% return.


CUSD

1D
-1.51%
1M
-0.08%
YTD
1.37%
6M
1.50%
1Y
4.89%
3Y*
5.09%
5Y*
10Y*

BILZ

1D
0.01%
1M
0.29%
YTD
0.84%
6M
1.84%
1Y
4.02%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CUSD vs. BILZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

CUSD has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is higher than BILZ's 0.14% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CUSD vs. BILZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CUSD
CUSD Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
CUSD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CUSD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
CUSD Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
CUSD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
CUSD Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

BILZ
BILZ Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
BILZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BILZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
BILZ Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
BILZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
BILZ Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CUSD vs. BILZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CrossingBridge Ultra-Short Duration ETF (CUSD) and PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund (BILZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CUSDBILZDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.38

19.23

-18.85

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.66

117.44

-116.77

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

44.68

-43.57

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.91

204.35

-203.44

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.63

1,813.57

-1,810.94

CUSD vs. BILZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CUSD Sharpe Ratio is 0.38, which is lower than the BILZ Sharpe Ratio of 19.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CUSD and BILZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CUSDBILZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

19.23

-18.85

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.73

10.37

-9.65

Correlation

The correlation between CUSD and BILZ is 0.01, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

CUSD vs. BILZ - Dividend Comparison

CUSD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.86%, more than BILZ's 4.15% yield.


TTM2025202420232022
CUSD
CrossingBridge Ultra-Short Duration ETF
13.86%14.05%7.10%3.62%1.14%
BILZ
PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund
4.15%4.19%4.95%2.23%0.00%

Drawdowns

CUSD vs. BILZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CUSD drawdown since its inception was -5.42%, which is greater than BILZ's maximum drawdown of -0.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CUSD and BILZ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CUSDBILZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.42%

-0.52%

-4.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.42%

-0.02%

-5.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.80%

0.00%

-2.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.40%

-0.01%

-0.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.88%

0.00%

+1.88%

Volatility

CUSD vs. BILZ - Volatility Comparison

CrossingBridge Ultra-Short Duration ETF (CUSD) has a higher volatility of 4.22% compared to PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund (BILZ) at 0.05%. This indicates that CUSD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BILZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CUSDBILZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.22%

0.05%

+4.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.47%

0.14%

+9.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.90%

0.21%

+12.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.54%

0.44%

+6.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.54%

0.44%

+6.10%