PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CURE vs. UTES
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CURE vs. UTES - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3x Shares (CURE) and Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CURE achieves a -7.96% return, which is significantly lower than UTES's 0.26% return. Over the past 10 years, CURE has outperformed UTES with an annualized return of 13.49%, while UTES has yielded a comparatively lower 12.27% annualized return.


CURE

1D
-0.55%
1M
13.71%
YTD
-7.96%
6M
-6.00%
1Y
28.51%
3Y*
3.05%
5Y*
1.51%
10Y*
13.49%

UTES

1D
1.56%
1M
-0.82%
YTD
0.26%
6M
0.49%
1Y
8.95%
3Y*
22.00%
5Y*
15.32%
10Y*
12.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CURE vs. UTES - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CURE
Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3x Shares
-7.96%22.55%-8.47%-9.40%-20.51%88.30%5.02%55.66%2.82%69.32%
UTES
Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF
0.26%25.71%45.35%-2.46%0.80%20.74%-0.30%25.48%5.14%14.21%

Correlation

The correlation between CURE and UTES is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2015

0.34

Over the past year, the correlation between CURE and UTES has dropped to 0.10 - well below their long-term average of 0.34, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

CURE vs. UTES - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CURE
UTES

Healthcare

100.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

100.0%

Healthcare

CURE
100.0%
UTES

-

Basic Materials

CURE

-

UTES

-

Communication Services

CURE

-

UTES

-

Consumer Cyclical

CURE

-

UTES

-

Consumer Defensive

CURE

-

UTES

-

Energy

CURE

-

UTES

-

Financial Services

CURE

-

UTES

-

Industrials

CURE

-

UTES

-

Real Estate

CURE

-

UTES

-

Technology

CURE

-

UTES

-

Utilities

CURE

-

UTES
100.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CURE vs. UTES — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CURE
CURE Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
CURE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CURE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
CURE Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
CURE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
CURE Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

UTES
UTES Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
UTES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UTES Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
UTES Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
UTES Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
UTES Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CURE vs. UTES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3x Shares (CURE) and Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CUREUTESDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.08

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.85

0.60

+0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.94

1.32

+0.61

CURE vs. UTES - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CURE Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is higher than the UTES Sharpe Ratio of 0.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CURE and UTES, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CURE vs. UTES - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CURE drawdown since its inception was -69.19%, which is greater than UTES's maximum drawdown of -35.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CURE and UTES.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CUREUTESDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.19%

-35.39%

-33.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.10%

-13.88%

-17.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-51.93%

-17.62%

-34.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.23%

-20.40%

-31.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-69.19%

-35.39%

-33.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.94%

-9.10%

-17.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.16%

-5.53%

-12.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.71%

6.29%

+7.42%

Volatility

CURE vs. UTES - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3x Shares (CURE) has a higher volatility of 14.30% compared to Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES) at 7.23%. This indicates that CURE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UTES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CUREUTESDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.30%

7.23%

+7.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.87%

17.05%

+13.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.32%

21.32%

+23.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.84%

20.62%

+23.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.59%

20.17%

+29.42%

CURE vs. UTES - Expense Ratio Comparison

CURE has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is higher than UTES's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

CURE vs. UTES - Dividend Comparison

CURE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, less than UTES's 1.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CURE
Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3x Shares
1.16%1.12%1.17%2.02%0.38%0.02%0.17%0.40%0.70%0.18%0.00%0.00%
UTES
Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF
1.49%1.42%1.51%2.44%2.13%1.94%2.09%1.84%2.09%3.44%3.53%0.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


CURE and UTES have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CURE has higher volatility (14.30%) compared to UTES (7.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CURE dropped -69.19% vs UTES's -35.39%.

On 10-year performance, CURE leads with 13.49% vs 12.27% for UTES. On fees, UTES is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, UTES has been the lower-risk option at 7.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, CURE has performed better with a 13.49% return vs 12.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

UTES is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for CURE.

UTES has the higher dividend yield at 1.49%, compared with 1.16% for CURE.

CURE is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while UTES is Utilities Equities. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Virtus Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 1.08% for CURE and 0.49% for UTES.

CURE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.60 vs 0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CURE and UTES

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer