PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CURE vs. QQQE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CURE vs. QQQE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3x Shares (CURE) and Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares (QQQE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CURE achieves a -18.38% return, which is significantly lower than QQQE's 19.12% return. Over the past 10 years, CURE has underperformed QQQE with an annualized return of 11.65%, while QQQE has yielded a comparatively higher 15.49% annualized return.


CURE

1D
2.17%
1M
4.39%
YTD
-18.38%
6M
-18.70%
1Y
21.60%
3Y*
-0.15%
5Y*
0.21%
10Y*
11.65%

QQQE

1D
-0.10%
1M
10.46%
YTD
19.12%
6M
17.48%
1Y
28.68%
3Y*
18.69%
5Y*
10.30%
10Y*
15.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CURE vs. QQQE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CURE
Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3x Shares
-18.38%22.55%-8.47%-9.40%-20.51%88.30%5.02%55.66%2.82%69.32%
QQQE
Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares
19.12%14.58%6.98%33.76%-24.47%17.93%37.85%36.43%-5.40%26.53%

Correlation

The correlation between CURE and QQQE is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2012

0.64

Over the past year, the correlation between CURE and QQQE has dropped to 0.35 - well below their long-term average of 0.64, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

CURE vs. QQQE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CURE
QQQE

Healthcare

100.0%
8.6%

Basic Materials

-

0.9%

Communication Services

-

9.1%

Consumer Cyclical

-

10.9%

Consumer Defensive

-

7.7%

Energy

-

2.0%

Financial Services

-

1.0%

Industrials

-

10.1%

Real Estate

-

0.7%

Technology

-

45.1%

Utilities

-

3.9%

Healthcare

CURE
100.0%
QQQE
8.6%

Basic Materials

CURE

-

QQQE
0.9%

Communication Services

CURE

-

QQQE
9.1%

Consumer Cyclical

CURE

-

QQQE
10.9%

Consumer Defensive

CURE

-

QQQE
7.7%

Energy

CURE

-

QQQE
2.0%

Financial Services

CURE

-

QQQE
1.0%

Industrials

CURE

-

QQQE
10.1%

Real Estate

CURE

-

QQQE
0.7%

Technology

CURE

-

QQQE
45.1%

Utilities

CURE

-

QQQE
3.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CURE vs. QQQE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CURE
CURE Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
CURE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CURE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
CURE Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
CURE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
CURE Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQE
QQQE Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
QQQE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQE Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQE Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CURE vs. QQQE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3x Shares (CURE) and Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares (QQQE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CUREQQQEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.35

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.70

3.06

-2.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.61

10.57

-8.96

CURE vs. QQQE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CURE Sharpe Ratio is 0.50, which is lower than the QQQE Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CURE and QQQE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CUREQQQEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

2.04

-1.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.00

0.51

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

0.75

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.76

-0.31

Drawdowns

CURE vs. QQQE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CURE drawdown since its inception was -69.19%, which is greater than QQQE's maximum drawdown of -32.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CURE and QQQE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CUREQQQEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.19%

-32.14%

-37.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.10%

-9.41%

-21.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-51.93%

-21.38%

-30.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.23%

-32.14%

-20.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-69.19%

-32.14%

-37.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-35.21%

-0.10%

-35.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.15%

-5.17%

-12.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.43%

2.72%

+10.71%

Volatility

CURE vs. QQQE - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3x Shares (CURE) has a higher volatility of 11.99% compared to Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares (QQQE) at 3.79%. This indicates that CURE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CUREQQQEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.99%

3.79%

+8.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.83%

10.64%

+19.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.19%

14.15%

+29.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.69%

20.30%

+23.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.51%

20.72%

+28.79%

CURE vs. QQQE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CURE has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQE's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

CURE vs. QQQE - Dividend Comparison

CURE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%, more than QQQE's 0.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CURE
Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3x Shares
1.31%1.12%1.17%2.02%0.38%0.02%0.17%0.40%0.70%0.18%0.00%0.00%
QQQE
Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares
0.52%0.52%0.86%0.79%0.98%3.83%0.54%0.74%0.80%0.65%1.17%0.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


CURE and QQQE have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CURE has higher volatility (11.99%) compared to QQQE (3.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CURE dropped -69.19% vs QQQE's -32.14%.

On 10-year performance, QQQE leads with 15.49% vs 11.65% for CURE. On fees, QQQE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, QQQE has been the lower-risk option at 3.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, QQQE has performed better with a 15.49% return vs 11.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for CURE.

CURE has the higher dividend yield at 1.31%, compared with 0.52% for QQQE.

CURE is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while QQQE is Nasdaq-100. CURE tracks Health Care Select Sector Index (300%), while QQQE tracks NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index. Their fees differ too: 1.08% for CURE and 0.35% for QQQE.

QQQE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CURE and QQQE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer