CURE.DE vs. XDWH.DE
CURE.DE (VanEck Genomics and Healthcare Innovators UCITS ETF A) and XDWH.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - CURE.DE tracks the MVIS Global Future Healthcare ESG while XDWH.DE tracks the MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CURE.DE returned -2.48%/yr vs 2.67%/yr for XDWH.DE. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CURE.DE charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XDWH.DE.
Performance
CURE.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CURE.DE achieves a -5.10% return, which is significantly lower than XDWH.DE's -1.98% return.
CURE.DE
- 1D
- 4.01%
- 1M
- 6.73%
- YTD
- -5.10%
- 6M
- -8.62%
- 1Y
- 6.04%
- 3Y*
- -2.48%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XDWH.DE
- 1D
- 2.85%
- 1M
- 3.42%
- YTD
- -1.98%
- 6M
- -1.51%
- 1Y
- 9.79%
- 3Y*
- 2.67%
- 5Y*
- 5.50%
- 10Y*
- 7.61%
CURE.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CURE.DE VanEck Genomics and Healthcare Innovators UCITS ETF A | -5.10% | 5.09% | 0.30% | -6.42% | -4.35% |
XDWH.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C | -1.98% | 2.21% | 7.44% | 0.04% | 1.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between CURE.DE and XDWH.DE is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2022 | 0.55 |
The correlation between CURE.DE and XDWH.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CURE.DE vs. XDWH.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CURE.DE
XDWH.DE
CURE.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Genomics and Healthcare Innovators UCITS ETF A (CURE.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CURE.DE | XDWH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.13 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.30 | 0.93 | -0.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.68 | 2.28 | -1.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CURE.DE | XDWH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 | 0.70 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.41 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.51 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.14 | 0.55 | -0.69 |
Drawdowns
CURE.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CURE.DE drawdown since its inception was -34.80%, which is greater than XDWH.DE's maximum drawdown of -26.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CURE.DE and XDWH.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CURE.DE | XDWH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.80% | -26.08% | -8.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.07% | -10.32% | -8.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.32% | -21.12% | -8.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -26.08% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.66% | -8.51% | -7.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.12% | -4.82% | -10.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.53% | 4.20% | +4.33% |
Volatility
CURE.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Genomics and Healthcare Innovators UCITS ETF A (CURE.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.73% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE) at 4.81%. This indicates that CURE.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDWH.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CURE.DE | XDWH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.73% | 4.81% | +0.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.20% | 9.51% | +5.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.97% | 13.69% | +6.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.74% | 13.43% | +7.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.74% | 14.69% | +6.05% |
CURE.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CURE.DE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than XDWH.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
CURE.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CURE.DE nor XDWH.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CURE.DE and XDWH.DE have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDWH.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDWH.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for CURE.DE.
CURE.DE tracks MVIS Global Future Healthcare ESG, while XDWH.DE tracks MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CURE.DE and 0.25% for XDWH.DE.
Find the right allocation for CURE.DE and XDWH.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer