PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CURE.DE vs. CBUF.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CURE.DE vs. CBUF.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in VanEck Genomics and Healthcare Innovators UCITS ETF A (CURE.DE) and iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist (CBUF.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CURE.DE achieves a -5.10% return, which is significantly lower than CBUF.DE's -2.22% return.


CURE.DE

1D
4.01%
1M
7.19%
YTD
-5.10%
6M
-8.94%
1Y
5.80%
3Y*
-2.48%
5Y*
10Y*

CBUF.DE

1D
2.74%
1M
3.91%
YTD
-2.22%
6M
-1.50%
1Y
7.40%
3Y*
0.62%
5Y*
4.66%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CURE.DE vs. CBUF.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
CURE.DE
VanEck Genomics and Healthcare Innovators UCITS ETF A
-5.10%5.09%0.30%-6.42%-4.35%
CBUF.DE
iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist
-2.22%2.56%0.75%0.33%3.31%

Correlation

The correlation between CURE.DE and CBUF.DE is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2022

0.55

The correlation between CURE.DE and CBUF.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CURE.DE vs. CBUF.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CURE.DE
CURE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
CURE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CURE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
CURE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
CURE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
CURE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

CBUF.DE
CBUF.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
CBUF.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBUF.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBUF.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
CBUF.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBUF.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CURE.DE vs. CBUF.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Genomics and Healthcare Innovators UCITS ETF A (CURE.DE) and iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist (CBUF.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CURE.DECBUF.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.10

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.30

0.68

-0.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.68

1.56

-0.88

CURE.DE vs. CBUF.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CURE.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.29, which is lower than the CBUF.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CURE.DE and CBUF.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CURE.DECBUF.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

0.53

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.14

0.44

-0.58

Drawdowns

CURE.DE vs. CBUF.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CURE.DE drawdown since its inception was -34.80%, which is greater than CBUF.DE's maximum drawdown of -25.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CURE.DE and CBUF.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CURE.DECBUF.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.80%

-25.94%

-8.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.07%

-10.87%

-8.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.32%

-21.76%

-7.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.66%

-9.66%

-6.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.12%

-5.65%

-9.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.53%

4.74%

+3.79%

Volatility

CURE.DE vs. CBUF.DE - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Genomics and Healthcare Innovators UCITS ETF A (CURE.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.73% compared to iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist (CBUF.DE) at 4.98%. This indicates that CURE.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CBUF.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CURE.DECBUF.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.73%

4.98%

+0.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.20%

9.70%

+5.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.97%

13.98%

+5.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.74%

13.60%

+7.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.74%

15.36%

+5.38%

CURE.DE vs. CBUF.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CURE.DE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than CBUF.DE's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

CURE.DE vs. CBUF.DE - Dividend Comparison

CURE.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CBUF.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
CBUF.DE
iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist
1.08%1.06%1.02%1.16%1.09%1.05%1.27%0.10%
CURE.DE
VanEck Genomics and Healthcare Innovators UCITS ETF A
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CURE.DE and CBUF.DE have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CBUF.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CBUF.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for CURE.DE.

CURE.DE tracks MVIS Global Future Healthcare ESG, while CBUF.DE tracks MSCI World Health Care ESG Reduced Carbon Select 20 35 Capped. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CURE.DE and 0.18% for CBUF.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CURE.DE and CBUF.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer