CULAX vs. CSIEX
CULAX (Calvert Ultra-Short Duration Income Fund) and CSIEX (Calvert Equity Fund) are both mutual funds - CULAX is a Ultrashort Bond fund managed by Calvert Research and Management, while CSIEX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Calvert Research and Management. Over the past 10 years, CULAX returned 2.46%/yr vs 11.61%/yr for CSIEX. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CULAX charges 0.72%/yr vs 0.91%/yr for CSIEX.
Performance
CULAX vs. CSIEX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CULAX achieves a 1.24% return, which is significantly higher than CSIEX's -12.17% return. Over the past 10 years, CULAX has underperformed CSIEX with an annualized return of 2.46%, while CSIEX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.61% annualized return.
CULAX
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 0.21%
- YTD
- 1.24%
- 6M
- 1.67%
- 1Y
- 4.00%
- 3Y*
- 5.07%
- 5Y*
- 3.36%
- 10Y*
- 2.46%
CSIEX
- 1D
- -1.28%
- 1M
- -3.26%
- YTD
- -12.17%
- 6M
- -12.57%
- 1Y
- -8.64%
- 3Y*
- 4.09%
- 5Y*
- 2.90%
- 10Y*
- 11.61%
CULAX vs. CSIEX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CULAX Calvert Ultra-Short Duration Income Fund | 1.24% | 4.55% | 5.69% | 6.07% | -0.56% | 0.43% | 0.66% | 3.30% | 1.15% | 1.27% |
CSIEX Calvert Equity Fund | -12.17% | 7.27% | 8.35% | 17.93% | -17.61% | 28.90% | 24.26% | 36.46% | 5.03% | 25.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between CULAX and CSIEX is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2006 | 0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CULAX vs. CSIEX — Risk / Return Rank
CULAX
CSIEX
CULAX vs. CSIEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert Ultra-Short Duration Income Fund (CULAX) and Calvert Equity Fund (CSIEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CULAX | CSIEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +11.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 3.78 | 0.91 | +2.87 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 13.28 | -0.54 | +13.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 54.31 | -1.18 | +55.49 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CULAX vs. CSIEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CULAX drawdown since its inception was -7.40%, smaller than the maximum CSIEX drawdown of -50.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CULAX and CSIEX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CULAX | CSIEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.40% | -50.81% | +43.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.30% | -14.28% | +13.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.30% | -14.87% | +14.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -2.19% | -25.71% | +23.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -7.40% | -30.50% | +23.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.10% | -14.28% | +14.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.21% | -6.24% | +6.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.07% | 6.50% | -6.43% |
Volatility
CULAX vs. CSIEX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Calvert Ultra-Short Duration Income Fund (CULAX) is 0.36%, while Calvert Equity Fund (CSIEX) has a volatility of 4.54%. This indicates that CULAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSIEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CULAX | CSIEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.36% | 4.54% | -4.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.86% | 10.03% | -9.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.32% | 12.69% | -11.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.35% | 16.30% | -14.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.42% | 17.19% | -15.77% |
CULAX vs. CSIEX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CULAX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is lower than CSIEX's 0.91% expense ratio.
Dividends
CULAX vs. CSIEX - Dividend Comparison
CULAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.92%, less than CSIEX's 26.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSIEX Calvert Equity Fund | 26.15% | 22.97% | 8.74% | 1.79% | 3.40% | 3.56% | 2.70% | 2.87% | 8.78% | 8.10% | 11.30% | 25.62% |
CULAX Calvert Ultra-Short Duration Income Fund | 3.92% | 4.13% | 4.90% | 4.52% | 1.47% | 0.64% | 1.25% | 2.44% | 2.10% | 1.13% | 1.10% | 0.66% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CULAX and CSIEX have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CSIEX has higher volatility (4.54%) compared to CULAX (0.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CULAX dropped -7.40% vs CSIEX's -50.81%.
CULAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.06 vs -0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CULAX and CSIEX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer