PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CULAX vs. CSIEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CULAX vs. CSIEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calvert Ultra-Short Duration Income Fund (CULAX) and Calvert Equity Fund (CSIEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CULAX achieves a 1.24% return, which is significantly higher than CSIEX's -12.17% return. Over the past 10 years, CULAX has underperformed CSIEX with an annualized return of 2.46%, while CSIEX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.61% annualized return.


CULAX

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.21%
YTD
1.24%
6M
1.67%
1Y
4.00%
3Y*
5.07%
5Y*
3.36%
10Y*
2.46%

CSIEX

1D
-1.28%
1M
-3.26%
YTD
-12.17%
6M
-12.57%
1Y
-8.64%
3Y*
4.09%
5Y*
2.90%
10Y*
11.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CULAX vs. CSIEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CULAX
Calvert Ultra-Short Duration Income Fund
1.24%4.55%5.69%6.07%-0.56%0.43%0.66%3.30%1.15%1.27%
CSIEX
Calvert Equity Fund
-12.17%7.27%8.35%17.93%-17.61%28.90%24.26%36.46%5.03%25.78%

Correlation

The correlation between CULAX and CSIEX is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2006

0.09

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CULAX vs. CSIEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CULAX
CULAX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
CULAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CULAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
CULAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
CULAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
CULAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

CSIEX
CSIEX Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
CSIEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSIEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSIEX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
CSIEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSIEX Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CULAX vs. CSIEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert Ultra-Short Duration Income Fund (CULAX) and Calvert Equity Fund (CSIEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CULAXCSIEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+11.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

3.78

0.91

+2.87

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

13.28

-0.54

+13.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

54.31

-1.18

+55.49

CULAX vs. CSIEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CULAX Sharpe Ratio is 3.06, which is higher than the CSIEX Sharpe Ratio of -0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CULAX and CSIEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CULAX vs. CSIEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CULAX drawdown since its inception was -7.40%, smaller than the maximum CSIEX drawdown of -50.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CULAX and CSIEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CULAXCSIEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.40%

-50.81%

+43.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.30%

-14.28%

+13.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.30%

-14.87%

+14.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-2.19%

-25.71%

+23.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-7.40%

-30.50%

+23.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

-14.28%

+14.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.21%

-6.24%

+6.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.07%

6.50%

-6.43%

Volatility

CULAX vs. CSIEX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Calvert Ultra-Short Duration Income Fund (CULAX) is 0.36%, while Calvert Equity Fund (CSIEX) has a volatility of 4.54%. This indicates that CULAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSIEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CULAXCSIEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.36%

4.54%

-4.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.86%

10.03%

-9.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.32%

12.69%

-11.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.35%

16.30%

-14.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.42%

17.19%

-15.77%

CULAX vs. CSIEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CULAX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is lower than CSIEX's 0.91% expense ratio.


Dividends

CULAX vs. CSIEX - Dividend Comparison

CULAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.92%, less than CSIEX's 26.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSIEX
Calvert Equity Fund
26.15%22.97%8.74%1.79%3.40%3.56%2.70%2.87%8.78%8.10%11.30%25.62%
CULAX
Calvert Ultra-Short Duration Income Fund
3.92%4.13%4.90%4.52%1.47%0.64%1.25%2.44%2.10%1.13%1.10%0.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


CULAX and CSIEX have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CSIEX has higher volatility (4.54%) compared to CULAX (0.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CULAX dropped -7.40% vs CSIEX's -50.81%.

CULAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.06 vs -0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CULAX and CSIEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer