PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CULAX vs. CFWAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CULAX vs. CFWAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calvert Ultra-Short Duration Income Fund (CULAX) and Calvert Global Water Fund (CFWAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CULAX achieves a 1.34% return, which is significantly lower than CFWAX's 3.39% return. Over the past 10 years, CULAX has underperformed CFWAX with an annualized return of 2.47%, while CFWAX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.43% annualized return.


CULAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.31%
YTD
1.34%
6M
1.77%
1Y
4.21%
3Y*
5.11%
5Y*
3.38%
10Y*
2.47%

CFWAX

1D
0.50%
1M
-0.95%
YTD
3.39%
6M
1.94%
1Y
10.11%
3Y*
9.84%
5Y*
4.81%
10Y*
8.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CULAX vs. CFWAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CULAX
Calvert Ultra-Short Duration Income Fund
1.34%4.55%5.69%6.07%-0.56%0.43%0.66%3.30%1.15%1.27%
CFWAX
Calvert Global Water Fund
3.39%14.38%3.91%18.34%-19.63%22.59%14.79%28.02%-13.63%18.88%

Correlation

The correlation between CULAX and CFWAX is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2008

0.12

The correlation between CULAX and CFWAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (1 year) to 0.19 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CULAX vs. CFWAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CULAX
CULAX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
CULAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CULAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
CULAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
CULAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
CULAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

CFWAX
CFWAX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
CFWAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CFWAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
CFWAX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
CFWAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
CFWAX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CULAX vs. CFWAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert Ultra-Short Duration Income Fund (CULAX) and Calvert Global Water Fund (CFWAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CULAXCFWAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+10.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

4.15

1.14

+3.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

13.98

0.83

+13.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

56.95

2.50

+54.45

CULAX vs. CFWAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CULAX Sharpe Ratio is 3.22, which is higher than the CFWAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CULAX and CFWAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CULAXCFWAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.22

0.78

+2.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

2.53

0.31

+2.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.75

0.50

+1.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.07

0.39

+1.68

Drawdowns

CULAX vs. CFWAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CULAX drawdown since its inception was -7.40%, smaller than the maximum CFWAX drawdown of -39.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CULAX and CFWAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CULAXCFWAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.40%

-39.67%

+32.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.30%

-12.79%

+12.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.30%

-17.64%

+17.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-2.19%

-29.17%

+26.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-7.40%

-36.25%

+28.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-7.71%

+7.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.21%

-7.96%

+7.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.07%

4.25%

-4.18%

Volatility

CULAX vs. CFWAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Calvert Ultra-Short Duration Income Fund (CULAX) is 0.31%, while Calvert Global Water Fund (CFWAX) has a volatility of 4.43%. This indicates that CULAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CFWAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CULAXCFWAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.31%

4.43%

-4.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.84%

10.65%

-9.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.32%

13.65%

-12.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.35%

15.72%

-14.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.42%

16.94%

-15.52%

CULAX vs. CFWAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CULAX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is lower than CFWAX's 1.24% expense ratio.


Dividends

CULAX vs. CFWAX - Dividend Comparison

CULAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.91%, less than CFWAX's 4.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CFWAX
Calvert Global Water Fund
4.62%4.77%9.25%2.57%1.47%0.93%0.77%0.83%1.30%0.93%0.00%0.03%
CULAX
Calvert Ultra-Short Duration Income Fund
3.91%4.13%4.90%4.52%1.47%0.64%1.25%2.44%2.10%1.13%1.10%0.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


CULAX and CFWAX have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CFWAX has higher volatility (4.43%) compared to CULAX (0.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CULAX dropped -7.40% vs CFWAX's -39.67%.

CULAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.22 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CULAX and CFWAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer