CUKX.L vs. ATO.PA
CUKX.L (iShares FTSE 100 UCITS ETF) is fund fund tracking the FTSE 100 Index, while ATO.PA (Atos SE) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, CUKX.L returned 9.82%/yr vs -37.69%/yr for ATO.PA. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CUKX.L vs. ATO.PA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CUKX.L is traded in GBp, while ATO.PA is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the ATO.PA values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CUKX.L achieves a 7.04% return, which is significantly higher than ATO.PA's -31.58% return. Over the past 10 years, CUKX.L has outperformed ATO.PA with an annualized return of 9.82%, while ATO.PA has yielded a comparatively lower -37.69% annualized return.
CUKX.L
- 1D
- 1.55%
- 1M
- 0.90%
- YTD
- 7.04%
- 6M
- 10.02%
- 1Y
- 22.07%
- 3Y*
- 15.22%
- 5Y*
- 11.77%
- 10Y*
- 9.82%
ATO.PA
- 1D
- 2.52%
- 1M
- -10.03%
- YTD
- -31.58%
- 6M
- -38.32%
- 1Y
- -4.74%
- 3Y*
- -67.57%
- 5Y*
- -61.36%
- 10Y*
- -37.69%
CUKX.L vs. ATO.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CUKX.L iShares FTSE 100 UCITS ETF | 7.04% | 25.78% | 9.30% | 7.72% | 4.97% | 17.48% | -11.28% | 17.23% | -9.05% | 12.45% |
ATO.PA Atos SE | -31.58% | 103.29% | -95.26% | -23.33% | -74.65% | -52.96% | 6.31% | 32.11% | -40.51% | 26.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between CUKX.L and ATO.PA is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2010 | 0.39 |
The correlation between CUKX.L and ATO.PA shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (3 years) to 0.39 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CUKX.L vs. ATO.PA — Risk / Return Rank
CUKX.L
ATO.PA
CUKX.L vs. ATO.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (CUKX.L) and Atos SE (ATO.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CUKX.L | ATO.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.02 | +0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.42 | -0.21 | +2.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.99 | -0.37 | +8.36 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CUKX.L vs. ATO.PA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CUKX.L drawdown since its inception was -34.50%, smaller than the maximum ATO.PA drawdown of -99.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CUKX.L and ATO.PA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CUKX.L | ATO.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.50% | -99.85% | +65.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.89% | -46.85% | +37.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.88% | -98.97% | +86.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.88% | -99.72% | +86.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.50% | -99.85% | +65.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.09% | -99.55% | +96.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.32% | -36.38% | +32.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.70% | 25.96% | -23.26% |
Volatility
CUKX.L vs. ATO.PA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (CUKX.L) is 3.63%, while Atos SE (ATO.PA) has a volatility of 15.44%. This indicates that CUKX.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ATO.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CUKX.L | ATO.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.63% | 15.44% | -11.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.68% | 42.76% | -33.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.06% | 60.05% | -48.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.73% | 126.59% | -113.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.08% | 92.42% | -77.34% |
Dividends
CUKX.L vs. ATO.PA - Dividend Comparison
Neither CUKX.L nor ATO.PA has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CUKX.L and ATO.PA have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for CUKX.L and ATO.PA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer