PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CU71.L vs. PQTSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CU71.L vs. PQTSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares USD Treasury Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (CU71.L) and PGIM TIPS Fund (PQTSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CU71.L is traded in GBp, while PQTSX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PQTSX values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CU71.L achieves a -0.14% return, which is significantly lower than PQTSX's 1.88% return.


CU71.L

1D
0.25%
1M
0.93%
YTD
-0.14%
6M
-0.64%
1Y
4.29%
3Y*
1.05%
5Y*
1.47%
10Y*
2.15%

PQTSX

1D
-0.07%
1M
0.99%
YTD
1.88%
6M
0.45%
1Y
5.53%
3Y*
1.04%
5Y*
1.87%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CU71.L vs. PQTSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CU71.L
iShares USD Treasury Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF (Acc)
-0.14%-0.08%3.77%-1.43%1.45%-1.10%3.33%2.76%7.03%-8.20%
PQTSX
PGIM TIPS Fund
1.88%-1.01%3.52%-2.78%-3.28%8.93%6.96%4.07%4.19%-8.60%

Correlation

The correlation between CU71.L and PQTSX is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017

0.73

The correlation between CU71.L and PQTSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CU71.L vs. PQTSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CU71.L
CU71.L Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
CU71.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CU71.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
CU71.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
CU71.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
CU71.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

PQTSX
PQTSX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
PQTSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PQTSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
PQTSX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
PQTSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
PQTSX Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CU71.L vs. PQTSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Treasury Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (CU71.L) and PGIM TIPS Fund (PQTSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CU71.LPQTSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.16

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.85

0.97

-0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.09

2.44

-0.35

CU71.L vs. PQTSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CU71.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is comparable to the PQTSX Sharpe Ratio of 0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CU71.L and PQTSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CU71.LPQTSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

0.86

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

0.21

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.15

+0.12

Drawdowns

CU71.L vs. PQTSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CU71.L drawdown since its inception was -20.50%, which is greater than PQTSX's maximum drawdown of -16.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CU71.L and PQTSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CU71.LPQTSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.50%

-16.71%

-3.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.02%

-5.90%

+0.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.33%

-8.25%

+0.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.69%

-16.71%

+1.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.12%

-9.58%

-3.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.11%

-8.16%

-1.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.05%

2.35%

-0.30%

Volatility

CU71.L vs. PQTSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares USD Treasury Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (CU71.L) is 1.45%, while PGIM TIPS Fund (PQTSX) has a volatility of 2.02%. This indicates that CU71.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PQTSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CU71.LPQTSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.45%

2.02%

-0.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.33%

5.09%

-0.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.96%

6.77%

-0.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.27%

9.16%

-0.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.55%

9.23%

+0.32%

CU71.L vs. PQTSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CU71.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than PQTSX's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

CU71.L vs. PQTSX - Dividend Comparison

CU71.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PQTSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.04%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CU71.L
iShares USD Treasury Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PQTSX
PGIM TIPS Fund
5.04%4.95%4.39%3.25%6.51%9.54%2.60%2.48%3.26%1.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


CU71.L and PQTSX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CU71.L and PQTSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer