PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CTRZX vs. CMIEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CTRZX vs. CMIEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Multi-Manager Total Return Bond Strategies Fund (CTRZX) and Multi-Manager International Equity Strategies Fund (CMIEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CTRZX achieves a 0.41% return, which is significantly lower than CMIEX's 10.54% return.


CTRZX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.47%
YTD
0.41%
6M
0.36%
1Y
5.69%
3Y*
4.43%
5Y*
0.19%
10Y*

CMIEX

1D
0.73%
1M
7.04%
YTD
10.54%
6M
13.47%
1Y
25.11%
3Y*
17.72%
5Y*
8.63%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CTRZX vs. CMIEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
CTRZX
Multi-Manager Total Return Bond Strategies Fund
0.41%7.48%2.03%5.78%-14.46%-0.95%8.47%9.07%1.99%
CMIEX
Multi-Manager International Equity Strategies Fund
10.54%32.46%3.96%21.41%-15.46%6.89%16.20%23.87%-16.02%

Correlation

The correlation between CTRZX and CMIEX is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2018

0.08

Over the past year, CTRZX and CMIEX have become more correlated (0.38) than their long-term average of 0.08, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CTRZX vs. CMIEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CTRZX
CTRZX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
CTRZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CTRZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
CTRZX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
CTRZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
CTRZX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

CMIEX
CMIEX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
CMIEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMIEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMIEX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
CMIEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMIEX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CTRZX vs. CMIEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Multi-Manager Total Return Bond Strategies Fund (CTRZX) and Multi-Manager International Equity Strategies Fund (CMIEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CTRZXCMIEXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.39

1.58

-0.19

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.10

2.27

-0.17

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.29

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.88

1.89

0.00

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.64

7.00

-1.35

CTRZX vs. CMIEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CTRZX Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is comparable to the CMIEX Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CTRZX and CMIEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CTRZXCMIEXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.39

1.58

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

0.52

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.50

-0.11

Drawdowns

CTRZX vs. CMIEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CTRZX drawdown since its inception was -19.33%, smaller than the maximum CMIEX drawdown of -35.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTRZX and CMIEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CTRZXCMIEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.33%

-35.35%

+16.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.03%

-13.08%

+10.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.14%

-14.50%

+8.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.33%

-32.43%

+13.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.54%

0.00%

-1.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.05%

-6.79%

+1.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.01%

3.52%

-2.51%

Volatility

CTRZX vs. CMIEX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Multi-Manager Total Return Bond Strategies Fund (CTRZX) is 1.44%, while Multi-Manager International Equity Strategies Fund (CMIEX) has a volatility of 5.13%. This indicates that CTRZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMIEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CTRZXCMIEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.44%

5.13%

-3.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.97%

12.97%

-10.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.11%

15.62%

-11.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.00%

16.57%

-10.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.11%

18.36%

-13.25%

CTRZX vs. CMIEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CTRZX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than CMIEX's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

CTRZX vs. CMIEX - Dividend Comparison

CTRZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.40%, less than CMIEX's 8.07% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CMIEX
Multi-Manager International Equity Strategies Fund
8.07%8.92%7.54%2.26%2.44%3.21%1.30%2.47%0.83%0.00%
CTRZX
Multi-Manager Total Return Bond Strategies Fund
4.40%4.39%4.61%3.47%2.70%2.13%4.69%3.32%2.89%2.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


CTRZX and CMIEX have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CMIEX has higher volatility (5.13%) compared to CTRZX (1.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CTRZX dropped -19.33% vs CMIEX's -35.35%.

CMIEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CTRZX and CMIEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer