CTNT vs. VRT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CTNT (Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service Inc. Class A Common Stock) and VRT (Vertiv Holdings Co.) are both stocks. CTNT operates in Auto & Truck Dealerships (Consumer Cyclical), while VRT operates in Electrical Equipment & Parts (Industrials). Over the past year, CTNT returned -99.36% vs 195.39% for VRT. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

CTNT vs. VRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service Inc. Class A Common Stock (CTNT) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CTNT achieves a -99.26% return, which is significantly lower than VRT's 104.63% return.

CTNT

• 1D: 5.45%
• 1M: -39.16%
• YTD: -99.26%
• 6M: -99.38%
• 1Y: -99.36%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VRT

• 1D: -0.91%
• 1M: 0.14%
• YTD: 104.63%
• 6M: 85.33%
• 1Y: 195.39%
• 3Y*: 156.10%
• 5Y*: 67.37%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CTNT vs. VRT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
CTNT Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service Inc. Class A Common Stock	-99.26%	-61.44%	-85.29%	-81.16%
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co.	104.63%	42.80%	136.82%	81.14%

Correlation

The correlation between CTNT and VRT is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.17
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2023	0.12

Fundamentals

Market Cap CTNT : $236.69K VRT : $129.97B
EPS CTNT : -$76.13 VRT : $3.99
PS Ratio CTNT : 0.09 VRT : 11.95
PB Ratio CTNT : 0.00 VRT : 30.62
Total Revenue (TTM) CTNT : $901.44K VRT : $10.84B
Gross Profit (TTM) CTNT : -$606.24K VRT : $3.92B
EBITDA (TTM) CTNT : -$3.36M VRT : $2.35B

Return for Risk

CTNT vs. VRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CTNT

CTNT Risk / Return Rank: 3
CTNT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
CTNT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
CTNT Omega Ratio Rank: 1
CTNT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
CTNT Martin Ratio Rank: 0

VRT

VRT Risk / Return Rank: 94
VRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
VRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
VRT Omega Ratio Rank: 91
VRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
VRT Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CTNT vs. VRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service Inc. Class A Common Stock (CTNT) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CTNT	VRT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.67	3.42	-4.09
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-2.19	3.75	-5.94
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.60	1.47	-0.87
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-1.00	7.94	-8.93
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-2.24	22.67	-24.91
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CTNT vs. VRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CTNT Sharpe Ratio is -0.67, which is lower than the VRT Sharpe Ratio of 3.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CTNT and VRT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CTNT	VRT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.67	3.42	-4.09
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.10	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.30	1.04	-1.35

Drawdowns

CTNT vs. VRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CTNT drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than VRT's maximum drawdown of -71.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTNT and VRT.

Drawdown Indicators

	CTNT	VRT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-100.00%	-71.24%	-28.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-99.62%	-24.78%	-74.84%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-61.28%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-71.24%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-100.00%	-11.90%	-88.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-91.66%	-16.22%	-75.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	44.25%	8.66%	+35.59%

Volatility

CTNT vs. VRT - Volatility Comparison

Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service Inc. Class A Common Stock (CTNT) has a higher volatility of 35.00% compared to Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) at 16.92%. This indicates that CTNT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CTNT	VRT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	35.00%	16.92%	+18.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	254.32%	44.82%	+209.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	147.97%	57.51%	+90.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	316.63%	61.71%	+254.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	316.63%	54.58%	+262.05%

Dividends

CTNT vs. VRT - Dividend Comparison

CTNT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
CTNT Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service Inc. Class A Common Stock	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co.	0.06%	0.11%	0.10%	0.05%	0.07%	0.04%	0.05%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CTNT and VRT in my portfolio?

CTNT and VRT have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CTNT or VRT?

CTNT has higher volatility (35.00%) compared to VRT (16.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CTNT dropped -100.00% vs VRT's -71.24%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.42 vs -0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.